...
首页> 外文期刊>Infectious Agents and Cancer >Comparison of survival outcomes of locally advanced cervical cancer by histopathological types in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database: a propensity score matching study
【24h】

Comparison of survival outcomes of locally advanced cervical cancer by histopathological types in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database: a propensity score matching study

机译:监测,流行病学和最终结果中局部晚期宫颈癌存活结果的比较(SEER)数据库:倾向评分匹配研究

获取原文
           

摘要

There has been limited research on the comparison of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) of cervical cancer and that lack of information may have significant bearing on the treatment of patients. We compared survival outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in locally advanced cervical cancer patients and examined factors related to the prognosis of cervical cancer. We identified 4131 patients with stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Variables related to the prognosis of cervical cancer were compared using both univariate and multivariate Cox models and log-rank method before and after propensity score matching. We compared the efficacy of radiotherapy alone to radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy or/and surgery in overall survival of SCC and AC. Our sample included 3385 patients with SCC (81.9%) and 746 patients with AC (18.1%). The 5-year overall survival on comparing the squamous cell carcinoma group and adenocarcinoma group was not significant (P??0.05). Using propensity score matching, 676 pairs of patients were selected. The 5-year overall survival of matched patients did not differ significantly (P??0.05). Histology was not independently associated with overall survival in multivariate Cox model (P??0.05). Factors affecting overall survival included FIGO stage IVA (P??0.05), chemotherapy (P??0.05), and external radiation combined with brachytherapy (P??0.05). Patients with SCC that were treated with radiation alone had significantly worse OS than AC patients receiving radiation only (P??0.05). The OS in AC of the cervix is similar to that SCC in when treated with radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and/or surgery but better when treated with radiation alone.
机译:对宫颈癌(SCC)和腺癌(AC)的宫颈癌(SCC)的比较有限的研究,并且缺乏信息可能对患者的治疗有显着的轴质。我们将鳞状细胞癌和腺癌在局部晚期宫颈癌患者中的生存结果进行了比较,并检查了与宫颈癌预后的因素。我们通过使用监测,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,鉴定了4131例患有阶段IB2-IVA宫颈癌患者的阶段IB2-IVA宫颈癌患者。使用单变量和多元COX模型和倾向分数匹配之前和之后的数变量和多元COX模型和对数秩法进行比较与宫颈癌预后的变量。我们将放射疗法单独加入放疗的疗效与SCC和AC的整体存活中的化疗或/和手术相结合。我们的样品包括3385例SCC(81.9%)和746名AC患者(18.1%)。比较鳞状细胞癌组和腺癌组的5年的总体存活率不显着(p?> 0.05)。使用倾向得分匹配,选择了676对患者。匹配患者的5年整体生存率没有显着差异(P?> 0.05)。组织学没有与多元COX模型的整体存活无关(P?> 0.05)。影响整体生存的因素包括富乙阶段IVA(P?<?0.05),化疗(P?<〜0.05),外部辐射与近距离放射治疗联合(P?<?0.05)。 SCC的患者单独治疗的辐射治疗均比仅接受辐射的AC患者(P?<0.05)。当用放射治疗与化疗和/或手术治疗时,子宫颈中的OR中的操作系统类似于该SCC,但单独用辐射治疗时更好。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号