首页> 外文期刊>In vivo. >Comparison of TMA Technique and Routine Whole Slide Analysis in Evaluation of Proliferative Markers Expression in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Cancer
【24h】

Comparison of TMA Technique and Routine Whole Slide Analysis in Evaluation of Proliferative Markers Expression in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Cancer

机译:喉鳞状细胞癌增殖性标志性评价中TMA技术与常规载玻片分析的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIM:Comparison of the expression of Ki-67, MCM3, 5, 7 and MTI/II proteins using immunohistochemistry (IHC) on whole section (WS) and tissue microarray (TMA) of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) samples.MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 51 archival paraffin blocks of LSCC were used. TMAs were prepared from 1.5 mm core punches. IHC reactions were performed using antibodies against Ki-67, minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCM3, 5, 7) and metallothionein (MTI/II).RESULTS:Spearman rank correlation test revealed moderate positive correlation in the case of Ki-67: WS vs. TMA (r=0.38, p=0.07) and strong positive correlation in regard to the rest of tested markers: MCM3, WS vs. TMA (r=0.49, p=0.0004); MCM5, WS vs. TMA (r=0.61, p0.0001); MCM7, WS vs. TMA (r=0.59, p0.0001); MTI/II, WS vs. TMA (r=0.66, p0.0001). Mann Whitney U-test showed no significant differences in the case of Ki-67 and MCM5. Moreover, Bland-Altman test showed a low level of bias in regard to Ki-67, WS vs. TMA and MCM5, WS vs. TMA.CONCLUSION:TMA may be an effective and reliable method of assessment of Ki-67 and MCM5 expression in LSCC.Copyright? 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.
机译:背景/目的:在喉鳞状细胞癌(LSCC)样品的全部(WS)和组织微阵列(IHC)上使用免疫组织化学(IHC)的KI-67,MCM3,5,7和MTI / II蛋白的表达比较。材料和方法:使用51种LSCC的存档链烷烃块。 TMA由1.5毫米芯冲击制成。使用针对Ki-67的抗体,小体积维持蛋白(MCM3,5,7)和金属硫蛋白(MTI / II)的抗体进行IHC反应。结果:Spearman等级相关试验在KI-67的情况下显示了中等的正相关性:WS与TMA(r = 0.38,p = 0.07)以及关于其余测试标记的强正相关性:MCM3,WS与TMA(r = 0.49,p = 0.0004); MCM5,WS与TMA(r = 0.61,p <0.0001); MCM7,WS与TMA(r = 0.59,p <0.0001); MTI / II,WS与TMA(r = 0.66,p <0.0001)。 Mann Whitney U-Test在KI-67和MCM5的情况下显示出没有显着差异。此外,Bland-Altman测试显示到KI-67,WS与TMA和MCM5,WS vs.TMA的低偏差偏差。结论:TMA可以是KI-67和MCM5表达的有效且可靠的评估方法在LSCC.Copyright? 2020年,国际抗癌研究所(George J. Delinasios博士),保留所有权利。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号