...
首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Understanding dentists’ management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Understanding dentists’ management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:了解牙医的牙齿深龋病管理:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Increasing evidence supports selective/incomplete (SE) or stepwise (SW) instead of non-selective/complete tissue removal for deep carious lesions in vital teeth, mainly as pulpal risks are significantly reduced. Our aims were to analyze the proportion of dentists who utilize SE/SW for deep lesions in permanent teeth and to identify barriers and facilitators of utilizing SE/SW. We included studies that were original, and reported on the proportion of dentists utilizing SE/SW (quantitative studies), or reported on barriers or facilitators of such utilization (qualitative studies). Electronic databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO) were searched and screening and data extraction performed by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were used for quantitative synthesis of the proportion of dentists utilizing SE/SW. Thematic analysis was performed to assess barriers and facilitators on SE/SW utilization. Identified themes were translated into the constructs of the theoretical domains framework. From 1728 articles, nine studies were included, all using quantitative methods. Four thousand one hundred ninety-nine dentists had been surveyed. The mean (95% CI) proportion of dentists using SE/SW for deep lesions was 53?% (44/62?%). More recent studies reported significantly higher proportions (p??0.05). Reported estimates and thematic analysis found dentists’ age and an understanding of the disease caries and the scientific rationale behind different removal strategies to affect dentists’ behavior. Guidelines, peers, and the social and professional identity were further associated with the motivation of utilizing SE/SW. Environmental incentives, sanctions, or restrictions, mainly of financial but also regulatory character, impacted on decision-making, as did the specific indication (the patient, the tooth) and the beliefs on how well different treatments perform. Around half of all dentists rejected evidence-based carious tissue removal strategies. A range of factors can be addressed for improving implementation. Future studies should use mixed qualitative-quantitative methods to yield a deeper understanding of dentists’ decision-making. PROSPERO CRD42016038047
机译:增加证据支持选择性/不完全(SE)或逐步(SW)代替非选择性/完全除去生命牙齿的深龋病病变,主要作为扶伤的风险显着降低。我们的目标是分析利用SE / SW在永久性牙齿的深部位的牙医的比例,并确定利用SE / SW的障碍和促进者。我们包括原始的研究,并报告了利用SE / SW(定量研究)的牙医比例,或者报告了这种利用的障碍或促进者(定性研究)。搜索电子数据库(PubMed,Central,Embase,PSYCINFO),并由两位审阅者进行筛选和数据提取。随机效应Meta分析和Meta回归用于使用SE / SW的牙医比例的定量合成。进行主题分析以评估障碍和促进者对SE / SW利用率。确定的主题被翻译成理论域框架的构造。从1728篇文章中,包括九项研究,所有这些研究都使用定量方法。已经调查了四千一百九十九牙医。使用SE / SW对深病灶的牙医的平均值(95%CI)比例为53Ω%(44/62?%)。最近的研究报告了比例显着更高(P?<?0.05)。报道估计和专题分析发现牙医年龄和对疾病的理解以及不同清除策略背后的科学理由,以影响牙医的行为。指导方针,同行和社会和专业认同与利用SE / SW的动机进一步相关。环境激励,制裁或限制,主要是财务,也受到监管性格,影响决策,具体指示(患者,牙齿)和对不同治疗如何表现的表现。大约一半的牙医都拒绝了基于证据的龋齿组织去除策略。可以解决一系列因素来改善实施。未来的研究应该利用混合的定性定量方法来产生更深刻的了解牙医的决策。 Prospero CRD42016038047

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号