...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine >Study of Antimicrobial Utilization and Cost of Therapy in Medicine Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India
【24h】

Study of Antimicrobial Utilization and Cost of Therapy in Medicine Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India

机译:印度三级护理医院医学重症监护单位治疗抗菌利用率及成本研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction:High utilization of antimicrobial agent (AMA) and inappropriate usage in an intensive care unit (ICU) intensifies resistant organism, morbidity, mortality, and treatment cost. Prescription audit and active feedback are a proven method to check the irrational prescription. To analyze and compare the utilization of drugs, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed daily defined dose (DDD)/100 patient days and days of therapy (DOT)/100 patient days to measure utilization of AMAs. Data of AMAs utilization are required for planning an antibiotic policy and for follow-up of intervention strategies.Materials and methods:A prospective observational study was conducted for 1 year from July 2018 to June 2019 and the data obtained from ICU of a tertiary care hospital. The demographic data, the disease data, and the utilization of different classes of AMAs [WHO-Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification] as well as their cost were recorded. Total number of patient days, DDD, DDD/100 patient days, and DOT/100 patient days were calculated as proposed by the WHO. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical software SPSS version 25.0. The descriptive analysis was performed using summary statistics median [interquartile range (IQR)].Results:A total 939 patients were included, out of them 332 (35.4%) were female. The median age of the total patients was 58 (45-70). The median length of stay in ICU was 3 days. Mortality rate during our study period was 38.6%. The highly utilized AMAs in our study was ceftriaxone (36.95 DDD/100 patient days) followed by piperacillin/tazobactam (31.57), meropenem (26.4), doxycycline (21.53), and polymyxin B (21.38). The association between APACHE II and SOFA score with use of restricted antibiotics found to be statistical significant (p value 0.018 and 0.000, respectively). The cost of antibiotics per patient and patient days were $449.97 and $93.77, respectively, while median value of total cost was $2,343.26.Conclusion:Ceftriaxone was the highest utilized AMA. The risk of receiving restricted antibiotics intensified with increasing prevalence of multidrug resistance bacteria and associated comorbidities. High treatment cost is responsible for higher utilization of restricted antibiotics in ICU.How to cite this article:Patra SK, Mishra SB, Rath A, Samal S, Iqbal SN. Study of Antimicrobial Utilization and Cost of Therapy in Medicine Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):938-942.Copyright ? 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.
机译:介绍:高利用抗菌剂(AMA),在重症监护室(ICU)中的不恰当使用加剧了抗性生物,发病率,死亡率和治疗成本。处方审计和主动反馈是检查非理性处方的经过验证的方法。分析和比较药物的利用,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)提出日常定义的剂量(DDD)/ 100患者日和治疗日(DOT)/ 100患者日,以衡量AMA的利用率。计划使用AMAS利用数据来规划抗生素政策和干预策略的后续行动。材料和方法:从2018年7月至2019年6月进行了一年的前瞻性观察研究,并从第三节护理医院获得了ICU的数据。记录了人口统计数据,疾病数据和不同类别的使用[WHO-解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类]以及其成本。患者天,DDD,DDD / 100患者天和DOT / 100患者日的总数计算为谁提出。使用统计软件SPSS版本25.0进行统计分析。使用摘要统计中位[四分位数范围(IQR)]进行描述性分析。结果:包括总共939名患者,其中332名(35.4%)是女性。总患者的中位年龄为58(45-70)。 ICU中位数的逗留时间为3天。我们研究期间的死亡率为38.6%。我们研究中高度利用的AMA是头孢曲松(36.95ddd / 100患者天),然后是Piperacillin / tazobactam(31.57),梅洛芬(26.4),戊苄酯(21.53)和多粘菌素B(21.38)。 Apache II和沙发评分之间的关​​联与使用限制抗生素发现统计显着(分别为0.018和0.000)。每位患者的抗生素和患者天的成本分别为449.97美元和93.77美元,而总成本的中位数为2,343.26美元。结论:CEFtriaxone是利用最高的AMA。接受受限制抗生素的风险加剧了多药抗菌细菌和相关的合并症的患病率。高治疗成本负责ICU的限制抗生素的利用率更高。如何引用本文:Patra Sk,Mishra Sb,Rath A,Samal S,IQBal Sn。西部三级护理医院医学重症监护单位抗菌利用率及其疗效研究。印度j crit care med 2020; 24(10):938-942.copyright? 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers(P)有限公司

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号