首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine >Evaluation and Validation of Four Scoring Systems: the APACHE IV, SAPS III, MPM0 II, and ICMM in Critically Ill Cancer Patients
【24h】

Evaluation and Validation of Four Scoring Systems: the APACHE IV, SAPS III, MPM0 II, and ICMM in Critically Ill Cancer Patients

机译:四种评分系统的评估与验证:Apache IV,SAPS III,MPM0 II和ICMM在批评性癌症患者中

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and aims: To evaluate and validate four severity-of-illness scores, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation IV (APACHE IV), simplified acute physiology score III (SAPS III), mortality probability models II at 0 hours (MPM0 II), and ICU cancer mortality model (ICMM), in a prospective cohort of critically ill cancer patients. Materials and methods: Single-center, prospective observational study performed in a 14-bedded combined medical–surgical ICU of a tertiary care cancer center of India, from July 2014 to November 2015. Score performance was judged by discrimination and calibration, using the area under receiver–operating characteristics (ROC) curve and Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, respectively. Results: A total of 431 patients were included in the study. Intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality were 37.4% and 41.1%, respectively. The area under ROC curve for APACHE IV, SAPS III, MPM0 II, and ICMM were 0.73, 0.70, 0.67, and 0.67, respectively. Calibration as calculated by Hosmer–Lemeshow analysis type C statistics for APACHE IV, SAPS III, MPM0 II, and ICMM shows good calibration with Chi-square values of 5.32, 9.285, 9.873, and 9.855 and p values of 0.723, 0.319, 0.274, and 0.275, respectively. Conclusion: All the four models had moderate discrimination and good calibration. However, none of the mortality prediction models could accurately discriminate between survivors and nonsurvivors in our patients.
机译:背景和目标:评估和验证四种严重性分数,急性生理和慢性健康评估IV(Apache IV),简化急性生理学评分III(SAPS III),死亡率概率模型II在0小时(MPM0 II),和ICU癌症死亡率模型(ICMM),在批评性癌症患者的前瞻性队列中。材料和方法:单中心,前瞻性观察研究,在印度的第14个层次的医疗手术ICU中进行,2014年7月至2015年11月。使用该地区的歧视和校准来评分绩效根据接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线和Hosmer-Lemeshow的良好良好测试。结果:研究共有431名患者。重症监护单位(ICU)和医院死亡率分别为37.4%和41.1%。 Apache IV,SAPS III,MPM0 II和ICMM下的ROC曲线下的区域分别为0.73,0.70,0.67和0.67。由Hosmer-Lemeshow分析类型C统计到APACHE IV,SAPS III,MPM0 II和ICMM计算的校准显示,Chi-Square值为5.32,9.285,9.873和9.855和P值的良好校准0.723,0.319,0.274,和0.275分别。结论:所有四种模型都有适度的歧视和良好的校准。然而,没有一个死亡率预测模型可以准确地区分幸存者和患者的非患者。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号