...
首页> 外文期刊>Immunity, Inflammation and Disease >Successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test
【24h】

Successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test

机译:在负双盲安慰剂控制食物挑战测试后成功引入牛奶是独立于攻击期间使用的总剂量和乳产品

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Failure of milk introduction after a negative food challenge test is reported in a substantial number of patients. For this reason, guidelines recommend that the total dose of milk protein for a food challenge test should be comparable to a normal serving. Objective Our aim is to compare the success rate of milk introduction after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled challenge test performed with different doses of milk protein and different milk products. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of 485 patients challenged with a low or high dose of milk protein. Pasteurized milk and milk protein powder were used for the low‐dose challenge tests, and condensed milk for the high‐dose challenge tests. Successful introduction was defined as regular milk consumption, and discontinuation of further introduction due to the reappearance of symptoms as unsuccessful introduction. We also evaluated the association between milk products and successful introduction. Results The outcome of 288 (59.4%) double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge tests was negative. There were no significant differences between the low and high dose of milk protein in patient characteristics, percentage of patients lost to follow‐up (15% vs 20%), in whom introduction had not yet been performed (4% vs 3.1%), reappearance of symptoms (18% vs 17%), and successful introduction (88.0% and 83.4%). Age, gender, specific immunoglobulin E for milk, dose of milk protein, and atopy were not associated with successful introduction. Children who experienced symptoms during the introduction were less likely to consume milk (P??.001). There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher successful introduction rate if pasteurized milk was used as test material compared to milk protein powder, and condensed milk. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance Successful introduction of milk after a negative challenge test is independent of the total dose of milk protein, and milk product used during the challenge test.
机译:在大量患者中报告了负食物挑战后乳汁介绍的背景失败。出于这个原因,指南建议食品挑战试验的总剂量的牛奶蛋白应与正常服务相媲美。目的我们的目标是在用不同剂量的牛奶蛋白和不同的牛奶产品进行阴性双盲安慰剂控制挑战试验后比较牛奶介绍的成功率。方法对485名患者进行了回顾性的图表审查,患有低剂量的牛奶蛋白。用于低剂量攻击试验,以及用于高剂量攻击试验的低剂量攻击试验,用牛奶蛋白粉末。成功的介绍被定义为常规牛奶消费,并且由于重新出现症状而停止进一步介绍,因为介绍不成功。我们还评估了牛奶产品与成功介绍之间的关联。结果288(59.4%)双盲安慰剂对照食品挑战试验的结果为阴性。患者特征的低剂量和高剂量的牛奶蛋白质之间没有显着差异,失去随访的患者的百分比(15%vs 20%),尚未进行引入(4%VS 3.1%),重新出现症状(18%vs 17%),成功介绍(88.0%和83.4%)。年龄,性别,特异性免疫球蛋白E用于牛奶,剂量的牛奶蛋白,以及特性与成功引入无关。在引言中经历过症状的儿童不太可能消耗牛奶(p?<?001)。如果用与牛奶蛋白粉末和凝聚牛奶相比,使用巴氏杀菌牛奶作为试验材料,则存在较高的成功引入率趋势。结论和临床关联在负挑战试验后的牛奶的成功引入与乳蛋白的总剂量无关,以及在攻击试验期间使用的乳制品。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号