...
首页> 外文期刊>Autoimmunity highlights >Anti-rods/rings autoantibody seropositivity does not affect response to telaprevir treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection
【24h】

Anti-rods/rings autoantibody seropositivity does not affect response to telaprevir treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection

机译:抗杆/环Autoantibody血液阳性不会影响对慢性丙型肝炎感染的Teladrevir治疗的反应

获取原文

摘要

Autoantibodies to intracellular 'rods and rings' structures (anti-rods/rings or anti-RR) are strongly associated with hepatitis C (HCV) patients treated with interferon-α/ribavirin (IFN/RBV) and are linked with non-responsiveness to IFN/RBV or relapse, especially in Italian patients. This is the first study to determine whether there is any correlation of anti-RR with non-responsiveness to IFN/RBV treatment in patients also treated with telaprevir (TPV), one of several new therapies for chronic HCV recently implemented. From 2013 to 2014, 52 HCV-infected patients were treated with IFN/RBV and TPV at five Italian clinics. Patient sera were collected and analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence for the presence of anti-RR antibodies. Patients were classified as anti-RR positive or anti-RR negative, and then various biological and clinical variables were analyzed to compare the two groups, including gender, age, HCV genotype, previous IFN/RBV treatment, and IFN/RBV/TPV treatment outcome. Of these 52 HCV patients treated with IFN/RBV/TPV, 10/32 (31%) who previously received IFN/RBV were anti-RR positive, compared to 0 of 20 treatment-na?ve patients. Anti-RR-positive patients relapsed more than anti-RR-negative patients (3/10, 30% vs. 2/42, 5%; p??0.05). However, zero anti-RR-positive patients were non-responsive, and frequencies of sustained virological response were similar (anti-RR positive: 7/10, 70% vs. anti-RR negative: 33/42, 79%). Overall, the data suggest that anti-RR seropositivity is not associated with resistance to TPV treatment in this patient cohort, but monitoring anti-RR-positive patients for relapse within the first 6?months after treatment may be useful.
机译:对细胞内的“杆和环”结构(抗杆/环或抗RR)的自身抗体与用干扰素-α/利巴韦林(IFN / RBV)治疗的丙型肝炎(HCV)患者强烈相关,并且与非反应性联系起来IFN / RBV或复发,尤其是意大利患者。这是第一项研究,以确定是否存在对IFN / RBV治疗的抗RR与IFN / RBV治疗的任何相关性,所述患者还用Teladrevir(TPV),最近实施的慢性HCV的几种新疗法之一。从2013年到2014年,52名HCV感染患者在5种意大利诊所治疗IFN / RBV和TPV。收集患者血清并通过间接免疫荧光进行分析,用于抗RR抗体。患者被归类为抗RR阳性或抗RR阴性,然后分析各种生物和临床变量,以比较两组,包括性别,年龄,HCV基因型,先前的IFN / RBV处理,以及IFN / RBV / TPV治疗结果。在这些52个HCV患者中,使用IFN / RBV / TPV,10/32(31%)的IFN / RBV的IFN / RBV是抗RR阳性的,而20患者的0患者的0次。抗RR阳性患者复发超过抗RR阴性患者(3/10,30%,5%,5%; P?<0.05)。然而,零抗RR阳性患者是非响应性的,并且持续的病毒学反应的频率相似(抗RR阳性:7 / 10,70%与抗RR阴性:33/42,79%​​)。总的来说,数据表明,抗RR血清阳性与该患者队列中的TPV治疗无关,但监测抗RR阳性患者在治疗后的前6个月内复发,可能是有用的。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号