首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Crop Science >Comparison of methods for the extraction of proteins from root and leaf tissue of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) for proteomic analysis
【24h】

Comparison of methods for the extraction of proteins from root and leaf tissue of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) for proteomic analysis

机译:从甘蔗(Saccharum SPP中的根叶组织蛋白质中蛋白质萃取方法对蛋白质组学分析的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The extraction of proteins from plants is a crucial procedure for successful protein determination such as purification, separation, and mass spectrometry.Protein extraction from plant tissues is generally difficult due to the presence of various molecules (cell wall, polysaccharides, and lipids) and interfering compounds.For this reason, the step of separation of proteins is a big challenge in obtaining good results in plant proteomic studies, notably from sugarcane.The current study assesses three extraction methods to prepare protein samples for proteomic analysis.Method 1 (control): TCA/acetone, method 2: TCA/acetone modified and Method 3: Phenol/SDS/ammonium acetate.Plants of cultivar RB92579 were grown in 10L pots under ideal humidity conditions in a greenhouse for 60 days.Samples collected on leaves +1 and roots were carried out using nitrogen and stored in an ultra-freezer at -80oC for later use in proteome assays.For the tested methods, a comparison was made between the quantitative and qualitative data obtained from the tissue of sugarcane leaves and roots.According to the results obtained, methods 2 and 3 produced the best yield in the extraction of total proteins from the leaves and roots of sugarcane, when compared to (control) method 1 (TCA/acetone).This can be observed when comparing the quantitative and qualitative data obtained using the different extraction methods.By comparing methods 2 and 3, the latter showed a massive gain of extracted proteins much greater than the first method, mainly when the extraction of total proteins from the roots are compared.Similarly, the 2-DE gels run after using method 3 showed less background, compared to method 2.Another observation was the presence of different “spots” in the 2-DE gels between the samples extracted using methods 2 and 3.Method 3 (phenol / SDS / ammonium acetate) presented better results for extraction of proteins and in the 2-DE gels, with a greater number of total and specific “spots”, greater reproducibility and less background.This method could be utilized as the standard method for proteomic studies in sugarcane.
机译:来自植物的蛋白质的提取是成功蛋白质测定的关键方法,例如纯化,分离和质谱。由于各种分子(细胞壁,多糖和脂质)和干扰,植物组织的蛋白萃取通常困难化学的原因,蛋白质的分离步骤是在植物蛋白质组学研究中获得良好的效果,特别是来自甘蔗的良好挑战。目前的研究评估了三种提取方法,用于制备蛋白质组学分析的蛋白质样品。方法1(对照): TCA /丙酮,方法2:TCA /丙酮改性和方法3:酚类/ SDS /乙酸铵。在温室的理想湿度条件下在10L盆中生长酚类/ SDS /乙酸铵。收集叶+1和根部使用氮气进行并储存在-80℃的超冷箱中,以便在蛋白质组测定中使用。对于测试方法,在Quanti之间进行比较从甘蔗叶和根的组织获得的提高和定性数据。根据所得的结果,方法2和3在与(对照)方法1相比时从甘蔗的叶片和根中提取总蛋白质的最佳产量。 (TCA /丙酮)。当比较使用不同的提取方法获得的定量和定性数据时,可以观察到。比较方法2和3,后者显示出大于第一种方法的提取蛋白质的大量增益,主要是当比较从根部的总蛋白质的提取。相比,使用方法3的2-de凝胶在使用方法3的情况下,与方法显示较少。另外观察是样品之间的2-de凝胶中的不同“斑点”的存在使用方法2和3.方法提取3(苯酚/ sds /醋酸铵)呈现出蛋白质和2-de凝胶中提取的更好的结果,总共和特定的“斑点”,更大再现性和较少的背景。该方法可用作甘蔗蛋白质组学研究的标准方法。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号