...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions >A six-beam method to measure turbulence statistics using ground-based wind lidars
【24h】

A six-beam method to measure turbulence statistics using ground-based wind lidars

机译:一种使用地面风光缘测量湍流统计的六梁法

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A so-called six-beam method is proposed to measure atmospheric turbulence using a ground-based wind lidar. This method requires measurement of the radial velocity variances at five equally spaced azimuth angles on the base of a scanning cone and one measurement at the centre of the scanning circle, i.e.using a vertical beam at the same height. The scanning configuration is optimized to minimize the sum of the random errors in the measurement of the second-order moments of the components (u,v, w) of the wind field. We present this method as an alternative to the so-called velocity azimuth display (VAD) method that is routinely used in commercial wind lidars, and which usually results in significant averaging effects of measured turbulence. In the VAD method, the high frequency radial velocity measurements are used instead of their variances. The measurements are performed using a pulsed lidar (WindScanner), and the derived turbulence statistics (using both methods) such as the u and v variances are compared with those obtained from a reference cup anemometer and a wind vane at 89 m height under different atmospheric stabilities. The measurements show that in comparison to the reference cup anemometer, depending on the atmospheric stability and the wind field component, the six-beam method measures between 85 and 101% of the reference turbulence, whereas the VAD method measures between 66 and 87% of the reference turbulence.
机译:提出了一种使用基于地基风潮汐的六梁方法来测量大气湍流。该方法需要在扫描锥体的底座上以五个等间隔的方位角的径向速度方差测量扫描锥的基部和扫描圆的中心的一个测量,即在相同高度处的垂直光束。优化扫描配置以最小化测量风场的组件(U,V,W)的二阶片中的随机误差的总和。我们将该方法作为所谓的速度方位角显示(VAD)方法的替代方案,该方法通常用于商业风光帽,并且通常导致测量湍流的显着平均效果。在VAD方法中,使用高频径向速度测量而不是它们的差异。测量使用脉冲LIDAR(Windscanner)进行,并且将衍生的湍流统计(使用两种方法)(使用两种方法)与在不同大气下的89米高度的参考杯风速计和89米高度的风叶片进行比较稳定性。测量结果表明,与参考杯风速计相比,根据大气稳定性和风场分量,六梁法在参考湍流的85和101%之间测量,而VAD方法介于66%和87%之间的措施参考湍流。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号