...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions >Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 and O4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers
【24h】

Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 and O4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers

机译:MAX-DOA和Zenith-Sky UV和可见光谱仪NO2和O4的倾斜柱测量的相互比较

获取原文

摘要

In June 2009, 22 spectrometers from 14 institutes measured tropospheric and stratospheric NO2 from the ground for more than 11 days during the Cabauw Intercomparison Campaign of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI), at Cabauw, NL (51.97° N, 4.93° E). All visible instruments used a common wavelength range and set of cross sections for the spectral analysis. Most of the instruments were of the multi-axis design with analysis by differential spectroscopy software (MAX-DOAS), whose non-zenith slant columns were compared by examining slopes of their least-squares straight line fits to mean values of a selection of instruments, after taking 30-min averages. Zenith slant columns near twilight were compared by fits to interpolated values of a reference instrument, then normalised by the mean of the slopes of the best instruments. For visible MAX-DOAS instruments, the means of the fitted slopes for NO2 and O4 of all except one instrument were within 10% of unity at almost all non-zenith elevations, and most were within 5%. Values for UV MAX-DOAS instruments were almost as good, being 12% and 7%, respectively. For visible instruments at zenith near twilight, the means of the fitted slopes of all instruments were within 5% of unity. This level of agreement is as good as that of previous intercomparisons, despite the site not being ideal for zenith twilight measurements. It bodes well for the future of measurements of tropospheric NO2, as previous intercomparisons were only for zenith instruments focussing on stratospheric NO2, with their longer heritage.
机译:2009年6月,来自14个研究所的22个光谱仪在Cauw,NL(51.97°N,4.93°E)的Cauw Intercomparison(Cindi)的Cabaw Interpolison(Cindi)运动中以超过11天的11天。所有可见仪器使用共同的波长范围和一组横截面,用于光谱分析。大多数仪器都是通过差分光谱软件(MAX-DOA)分析的多轴设计,通过检查其最小二乘直线的斜率来比较其非Zenith倾斜列,该仪表拟合到各种仪器的平均值。 ,在服用30分钟的平均线后。通过适合参考仪器的内插值来比较暮色附近的Zenith倾斜列,然后通过最佳仪器的斜坡的平均值标准化。对于可见的MAX-DOAS仪器,除了一个仪器之外的NO2和O4的安装斜率的装置在几乎所有非天性升高的统一中的10%以内,大多数是5%。 UV MAX-DOAS仪器的值几乎与良好一样好,分别为12%和7%。对于在暮光之城附近的Zenith的可见仪器,所有乐器的安装斜坡的手段均在1%的统一范围内。尽管该网站对Zenith暮光之城测量不理想,但这项协议水平与前几个竞争一样好。它为未来的对流层No2的未来,因为以前的离法仅适用于聚焦在平流层No2的Zenith仪器,遗产较长。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号