首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Evaluation of cloud convection and tracer transport in a three-dimensional chemical transport model
【24h】

Evaluation of cloud convection and tracer transport in a three-dimensional chemical transport model

机译:三维化学传输模型中云对流与示踪运输的评价

获取原文
           

摘要

We investigate the performance of cloud convection and tracer transport in a global off-line 3-D chemical transport model. Various model simulations are performed using different meteorological (re)analyses (ERA-40, ECMWF operational and ECMWF Interim) to diagnose the updraft mass flux, convective precipitation and cloud top height. The diagnosed upward mass flux distribution from TOMCAT agrees quite well with the ECMWF reanalysis data (ERA-40 and ERA-Interim) below 200 hPa. Inclusion of midlevel convection improves the agreement at mid-high latitudes. However, the reanalyses show strong convective transport up to 100 hPa, well into the tropical tropopause layer (TTL), which is not captured by TOMCAT. Similarly, the model captures the spatial and seasonal variation of convective cloud top height although the mean modelled value is about 2 km lower than observed. The ERA-Interim reanalyses have smaller archived upward convective mass fluxes than ERA-40, and smaller convective precipitation, which is in better agreement with satellite-based data. TOMCAT captures these relative differences when diagnosing convection from the large-scale fields. The model also shows differences in diagnosed convection with the version of the operational analyses used, which cautions against using results of the model from one specific time period as a general evaluation. We have tested the effect of resolution on the diagnosed modelled convection with simulations ranging from 5.6 5.6 to 1 1. Overall, in the off-line model, the higher model resolution gives stronger vertical tracer transport, however, it does not make a large change to the diagnosed convective updraft mass flux (i.e., the model results using the convection scheme fail to capture the strong convection transport up to 100 hPa as seen in the archived convective mass fluxes). Similarly, the resolution of the forcing winds in the higher resolution CTM does not make a large improvement compared to the archived mass fluxes. Including a radon tracer in the model confirms the importance of convection for reproducing observed midlatitude profiles. The model run using archived mass fluxes transports significantly more radon to the upper troposphere but the available data does not strongly discriminate between the different model versions.
机译:我们调查云对流和示踪运输在全球离线3-D化学传输模型中的性能。使用不同的气象(RE)分析(ERA-40,ECMWF运营和ECMWF临时)来执行各种模型模拟,以诊断上升量磁通量,对流沉淀和云顶部高度。来自Tomcat的诊断出的向上质量通量分布与EcmWF再分析数据(ERA-40和ERA-INSIM)低于200 HPA。纳入MIDLEVEL对流会改善中高纬度的协议。然而,Reanalyses显得强烈的对流运输,高达100 HPA,井进入热带对象层(TTL),这是由Tomcat捕获的。类似地,模型捕获对流云顶部高度的空间和季节变化,尽管平均模型值比观察到的2 km大约2公里。 ERA-Instim ReanaLyses具有比ERA-40更小的归档向上对流质量势态,以及更少于基于卫星数据的较好的对流沉淀。 Tomcat在诊断来自大型字段的对流时捕获这些相对差异。该模型还显示了与所用操作分析的版本的诊断对流的差异,这是从一个特定时间段使用模型的结果作为一般性评估。我们已经测试了分辨率对诊断的模拟对流的影响,模拟范围从5.6 5.6到1 1.总的来说,在离线模型中,更高的模型分辨率提供了更强大的垂直示踪运输,但是它不会产生大量变化对于诊断综合的对流上升量态量(即,使用对流方案的模型结果未能在存档的对流质量势态中看到的高达100hPa的强对流传输)。类似地,与存档的质量通量相比,在较高分辨率CTM中的迫使风的分辨率不会产生大的改进。在模型中包括氡追踪器证实了对转向的重要性,对再现观察到的中立性概况。使用存档质量通量的模型运行将更多地传输到上层对流层的氡,但可用的数据不会在不同的型号版本之间强烈区分。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号