首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Atmospheric boundary layer top height in South Africa: measurements with lidar and radiosonde compared to three atmospheric models
【24h】

Atmospheric boundary layer top height in South Africa: measurements with lidar and radiosonde compared to three atmospheric models

机译:南非的大气边界层顶部高度:与三种大气模型相比,LIDAR和无线电探测器的测量

获取原文
           

摘要

Atmospheric lidar measurements were carried out at Elandsfontein measurement station, on the eastern Highveld approximately 150 km east of Johannesburg in South Africa throughout 2010. The height of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) top was continuously measured using a Raman lidar, PollyXT (POrtabLe Lidar sYstem eXTended). High atmospheric variability together with a large surface temperature range and significant seasonal changes in precipitation were observed, which had an impact on the vertical mixing of particulate matter, and hence, on the PBL evolution. The results were compared to radiosondes, CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) space-borne lidar measurements and three atmospheric models that followed different approaches to determine the PBL top height. These models included two weather forecast models operated by ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts) and SAWS (South African Weather Service), and one mesoscale prognostic meteorological and air pollution regulatory model TAPM (The Air Pollution Model). The ground-based lidar used in this study was operational for 4935 h during 2010 (49% of the time). The PBL top height was detected 86% of the total measurement time (42% of the total time). Large seasonal and diurnal variations were observed between the different methods utilised. High variation was found when lidar measurements were compared to radiosonde measurements. This could be partially due to the distance between the lidar measurements and the radiosondes, which were 120 km apart. Comparison of lidar measurements to the models indicated that the ECMWF model agreed the best with mean relative difference of 15.4%, while the second best correlation was with the SAWS model with corresponding difference of 20.1%. TAPM was found to have a tendency to underestimate the PBL top height. The wind speeds in the SAWS and TAPM models were strongly underestimated which probably led to underestimation of the vertical wind and turbulence and thus underestimation of the PBL top height. Comparison between ground-based and satellite lidar shows good agreement with a correlation coefficient of 0.88. On average, the daily maximum PBL top height in October (spring) and June (winter) was 2260 m and 1480 m, respectively. To our knowledge, this study is the first long-term study of PBL top heights and PBL growth rates in South Africa.
机译:在2010年南非东部的Elandsfontein测量站在Elandsfontein测量站进行了大气的LIDAR测量。在2010年的南非以东大约150公里。使用拉曼LIDAR,Pollyxt持续测量行星边界层(PBL)顶部的高度(便携式利达系统扩展)。观察到高气氛变化以及大的表面温度范围和显着的季节性变化的沉淀,这对颗粒物质的垂直混合产生了影响,并且因此在PBL进化上产生。将结果与辐射钻石相比,卡利普(具有正交极化的云 - 气溶胶激光雷达)空间传播的激光雷达测量和三种大气模型,其遵循不同的方法来确定PBL顶部高度。这些型号包括Ecmwf(欧洲中距离天气预报中心)和锯(南非天气预报中心)和锯(南非天气预报)和锯(南非天气预报中心)以及一个Messcale预后气象和空气污染监管模型Tapm(空气污染模型)。本研究中使用的基于地面的激光雷达在2010年(49%的时间)期间运行4935小时。 PBL顶部高度检测到总测量时间的86%(总时间的42%)。在所使用的不同方法之间观察到大的季节性和昼夜变化。在将LIDAR测量与可无线电钻石测量进行比较时,发现了高变异。这可能部分是由于LIDAR测量和辐射刚度之间的距离,而偏远超过120公里。 LIDAR测量对模型的比较表明,ECMWF模型同意最佳,平均相对差异为15.4%,而第二个最佳相关性与锯模型相应差异为20.1%。发现Tapm具有低估PBL顶部高度的趋势。锯和TapM模型中的风速强烈低估,这可能导致垂直风和湍流低估,从而低估PBL顶部高度。地面和卫星激光器之间的比较显示了与0.88的相关系数的良好一致性。平均而言,10月份的每日最大PBL高度(春季)和6月(冬季)分别为2260米和1480米。据我们所知,这项研究是南非PBL顶部高度和PBL增长率的第一次长期研究。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号