首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >The 2015–2016 carbon cycle as seen from OCO-2 and the global in situ network
【24h】

The 2015–2016 carbon cycle as seen from OCO-2 and the global in situ network

机译:从OCO-2和全球原位网络中看到的2015-2016碳循环

获取原文
           

摘要

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 has been on orbit since?2014, and its global coverage holds the potential to reveal new information about the carbon cycle through the use of top-down atmospheric inversion methods combined with column average CO2 retrievals. We employ a large ensemble of atmospheric inversions utilizing different transport models, data assimilation techniques, and prior flux distributions in order to quantify the satellite-informed fluxes from OCO-2 Version 7r land observations and their uncertainties at continental scales. Additionally, we use in situ measurements to provide a baseline against which to compare the satellite-constrained results. We find that within the ensemble spread, in situ observations, and satellite retrievals constrain a similar global total carbon sink of 3.7±0.5PgCyr?1, and 1.5±0.6PgCyr?1 for global land, for the 2015–2016 annual mean. This agreement breaks down in smaller regions, and we discuss the differences between the experiments. Of particular interest is the difference between the different assimilation constraints in the tropics, with the largest differences occurring in tropical Africa, which could be an indication of the global perturbation from the 2015–2016 El Ni?o. Evaluation of posterior concentrations using TCCON and aircraft observations gives some limited insight into the quality of the different assimilation constraints, but the lack of such data in the tropics inhibits our ability to make strong conclusions there.
机译:轨道碳观察台-2自2014年以来一直在轨道上,其全球覆盖率通过使用自上而下的大气反演方法与柱平均二氧化碳检索相结合,揭示有关碳循环的新信息。我们采用了利用不同的运输模型,数据同化技术和先前的助焊剂分布的大型常压反转集合,以量化来自OCO-2版本7R土地观测的卫星通知的助量及其在大陆尺度的不确定性。另外,我们使用原位测量来提供基线,用于比较卫星受约束的结果。我们发现,在整体观察和卫星检索中,卫星检索限制了3.7±0.5pgcyr?1,1.5±0.6pgcyr?1的类似全球总碳汇,2015-2016年度平均值。本协议在较小的地区中断,我们讨论了实验之间的差异。特别感兴趣的是热带地区不同的同化约束之间的差异,热带非洲的差异最大,可能是2015-2016 El Ni的全球扰动的迹象。使用TCCON和飞机观测评估后浓度对不同的同化限制的质量有限,但热带地区的缺乏缺乏这些数据抑制了我们在那里得出强烈结论的能力。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号