首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Carbonaceous aerosol AAE inferred from in-situ aerosol measurements at the Gosan ABC super site, and the implications for brown carbon aerosol
【24h】

Carbonaceous aerosol AAE inferred from in-situ aerosol measurements at the Gosan ABC super site, and the implications for brown carbon aerosol

机译:从戈萨兰ABC超级部位的原位气溶胶测量推断碳质气溶胶AAE,以及对棕色碳气溶胶的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Mass Absorption Cross section (MAC) and Absorption ?ngstr?m Exponent (AAE) have been commonly estimated for ambient aerosols but rarely for black carbon (BC) or organic aerosol (OA) alone in the ambient conditions. Here, we provide estimates of BC (and OA) MAC and AAE in East Asian outflow, by analyzing field data collected at the Gosan ABC super site. At this site, EC (and OC) carbon mass, the aerosol absorption coefficient at 7 wavelengths and PM mass density were continuously measured from October 2009 to June 2010. We remove the absorption data with significant dust influence using the mass ratio of PM10 to PM2.5. The remaining data shows an AAE of about 1.27, which we suggest represent the average carbonaceous aerosol (CA) AAE at Gosan. We find a positive correlation between the mass ratio of OC to EC and CA AAE, and successfully increase the correlation by filtering out data associated with weak absorption signal. After the filtering, absorption coefficient is regressed on OC and EC mass densities. BC and OA MACs are found to be 5.1 (3.8–6.1) and 1.4 (0.8–2.0) m2 g1 at 520 nm respectively. From the estimated BC and OA MAC, we find that OA contributes about 45% to CA absorption at 520 nm. BC AAE is found to be 0.7–1.0, and is probably even lower considering the instrument bias. OA AAE is found to be 1.6–1.8. Compared with a previous estimate of OA MAC and AAE near biomass burning, our estimates at Gosan strongly suggest that the strongly-absorbing so-called brown carbon spheres are either unrelated to biomass burning or absent near the emission source.
机译:容量吸收横截面(MAC)和吸收αngstrαm指数(AAE)已经常见地估计了环境气溶胶,但很少用于在环境条件下单独的黑碳(BC)或有机气溶胶(OA)。在这里,我们通过分析在GOSAN ABC超级站点收集的现场数据来提供BC(和OA)MAC和AAE在东亚流出中的估计。在该网站,EC(和OC)碳质量,7波长和PM质量密度的气溶胶吸收系数从2009年10月至2010年6月持续测量。我们使用PM10至PM2的质量比,除去具有显着粉尘影响的吸收数据.5。其余数据显示为约1.27的AAE,我们建议代表戈萨兰的平均碳质气溶胶(CA)AAE。我们发现OC与EC和CA AAE的质量比之间的正相关性,并通过滤除与弱吸收信号相关的数据来成功增加相关性。在过滤之后,在OC和EC质量密度上回归吸收系数。 BC和OA MAC分别发现520nm的5.1(3.8-6.1)和1.4(0.8-2.0)M2 G1。从估计的BC和OA MAC,我们发现OA在520纳米时贡献约45%的CA吸收。 BC AAE被发现为0.7-1.0,考虑到仪器偏压,甚至降低。 OA AAE被发现为1.6-1.8。与先前对生物量燃烧的OA MAC和AAE的估计相比,我们在戈斯兰的估计强烈建议,强吸收的所谓的棕色碳球与生物量燃烧或缺席在排放源附近不相关。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号