首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Land-surface controls on afternoon precipitation diagnosed from observational data: uncertainties and confounding factors
【24h】

Land-surface controls on afternoon precipitation diagnosed from observational data: uncertainties and confounding factors

机译:在观察数据诊断下午沉淀的陆地对照:不确定性和混杂因素

获取原文
           

摘要

The feedback between soil moisture and precipitation has long been a topic of interest due to its potential for improving weather and seasonal forecasts. The generally proposed mechanism assumes a control of soil moisture on precipitation via the partitioning of the surface turbulent heat fluxes, as assessed via the evaporative fraction (EF), i.e., the ratio of latent heat to the sum of latent and sensible heat, in particular under convective conditions. Our study investigates the poorly understood link between EF and precipitation by relating the before-noon EF to the frequency of afternoon precipitation over the contiguous US, through statistical analyses of multiple EF and precipitation data sets. We analyze remote-sensing data products (Global Land Evaporation: the Amsterdam Methodology (GLEAM) for EF, and radar precipitation from the NEXt generation weather RADar system (NEXRAD)), FLUXNET station data, and the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR). Data sets agree on a region of positive relationship between EF and precipitation occurrence in the southwestern US. However, a region of strong positive relationship over the eastern US in NARR cannot be confirmed with observation-derived estimates (GLEAM, NEXRAD and FLUXNET). The GLEAM–NEXRAD data set combination indicates a region of positive EF–precipitation relationship in the central US. These disagreements emphasize large uncertainties in the EF data. Further analyses highlight that much of these EF–precipitation relationships could be explained by precipitation persistence alone, and it is unclear whether EF has an additional role in triggering afternoon precipitation. This also highlights the difficulties in isolating a land impact on precipitation. Regional analyses point to contrasting mechanisms over different regions. Over the eastern US, our analyses suggest that the EF–precipitation relationship in NARR is either atmospherically controlled (from precipitation persistence and potential evaporation) or driven by vegetation interception rather than soil moisture. Although this aligns well with the high forest cover and the wet regime of that region, the role of interception evaporation is likely overestimated because of low nighttime evaporation in NARR. Over the central and southwestern US, the EF–precipitation relationship is additionally linked to soil moisture variations, owing to the soil-moisture-limited climate regime.
机译:由于其改善天气和季节性预测的可能性,土壤水分和降水之间的反馈长期以来一直是感兴趣的主题。通常所提出的机构假定通过蒸发级分(EF)的评估,通过蒸发级分(即,潜热比与潜伏和明智的热量的比率的评估来控制土壤水分对沉淀的沉淀。在对流条件下。我们的研究通过在邻近邻近的UF和降水数据集的统计分析和降水数据集中,研究了EF和降水之间的近期降水频率,调查了EF和降水之间的不良链接。我们分析遥感数据产品(全球陆地蒸发:EF的Amsterdam方法(闪光),以及从下一代天气雷达系统(NEXRAD)),Fluxnet站数据和北美区域重新分析(Nar)的雷达降水。数据集就美国西南部的EF和降水发生之间的积极关系区域。然而,在ant中的东部地区的一个强大的积极关系区域不能用观察衍生的估计(Gloweam,Nexrad和Fluxnet)确认。 GLEAM-NEXRAD数据集合组合表示美国中部的正电气降水关系区域。这些分歧强调了EF数据中的大不确定性。进一步分析突出显示这些EF沉淀关系中的大部分可以通过单独降水持久性来解释,目前还不清楚EF是否在触发下午沉淀方面具有额外的作用。这也强调了隔离土地对降水的影响。区域分析指向不同地区的对比机制。在美国东部,我们的分析表明,ant中的EF降水关系是大气控制(从降水持续和潜在蒸发)或由植被拦截而不是土壤水分驱动。虽然这与高森林覆盖率良好和该地区的湿制度良好,但由于NAR中的夜间蒸发,拦截蒸发的作用可能大得多。在美国中部和西南部,由于土壤水分有限的气候制度,EF降水关系另外与土壤水分变化有关。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号