首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Fossil vs. non-fossil sources of fine carbonaceous aerosols in four Chinese cities during the extreme winter haze episode of 2013
【24h】

Fossil vs. non-fossil sources of fine carbonaceous aerosols in four Chinese cities during the extreme winter haze episode of 2013

机译:在极端冬季阴霾发作期间,四个中国城市中的四个中国城市中碳质气溶胶的化石与非化石来源

获取原文
       

摘要

During winter 2013, extremely high concentrations (i.e., 4–20 times higher than the World Health Organization guideline) of PM2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter 14C and biomass-burning marker measurements using Latin hypercube sampling allowed a quantitative source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosols. Based on 14C measurements of EC fractions (six samples each city), we found that fossil emissions from coal combustion and vehicle exhaust dominated EC with a mean contribution of 75 ± 8% across all sites. The remaining 25 ± 8% was exclusively attributed to biomass combustion, consistent with the measurements of biomass-burning markers such as anhydrosugars (levoglucosan and mannosan) and water-soluble potassium (K+). With a combination of the levoglucosan-to-mannosan and levoglucosan-to-K+ ratios, the major source of biomass burning in winter in China is suggested to be combustion of crop residues. The contribution of fossil sources to OC was highest in Beijing (58 ± 5%) and decreased from Shanghai (49 ± 2%) to Xi'an (38 ± 3%) and Guangzhou (35 ± 7%). Generally, a larger fraction of fossil OC was from secondary origins than primary sources for all sites. Non-fossil sources accounted on average for 55 ± 10 and 48 ± 9% of OC and total carbon (TC), respectively, which suggests that non-fossil emissions were very important contributors of urban carbonaceous aerosols in China. The primary biomass-burning emissions accounted for 40 ± 8, 48 ± 18, 53 ± 4 and 65 ± 26% of non-fossil OC for Xi'an, Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, respectively. Other non-fossil sources excluding primary biomass burning were mainly attributed to formation of secondary organic carbon (SOC) from non-fossil precursors such as biomass-burning emissions. For each site, we also compared samples from moderately to heavily polluted days according to particulate matter mass. Despite a significant increase of the absolute mass concentrations of primary emissions from both fossil and non-fossil sources during the heavily polluted events, their relative contribution to TC was even decreased, whereas the portion of SOC was consistently increased at all sites. This observation indicates that SOC was an important fraction in the increment of carbonaceous aerosols during the haze episode in China.
机译:在2013年冬季,PM2.5的极高浓度(即,比世界卫生组织指南高4-20倍)(使用拉丁超立方体采样采样具有空气动力直径14c和生物质燃烧标记测量的颗粒物质允许定量源分配碳质气溶胶。基于EC分数的14℃测量(每个城市的六个样本),我们发现煤炭燃烧的化石排放量和车辆排气占主导地位的EC在所有地点的平均贡献为75±8%。其余25±8%是完全归因于生物量燃烧,与生物质燃烧标记物的测量一致,例如硫醇(Levoglucosan和Mannosan)和水溶性钾(K +)。用左葡葡糖对甘露治和左葡聚糖至-K +比例组合,中国冬季燃烧的主要生物质来源被建议是作物残留的燃烧。化石来源对北京的贡献最高(58± 5%)从上海(49±2%)减少到西安(38±3%)和广州(35±7%)。通常,大部分的化石OC来自次要的起源,而不是所有网站的主要来源。非化石源平均占55±10和48±9%的OC和总碳(TC),这表明非化石排放是中国城市碳质气溶胶的重要贡献者。主要生物质燃烧排放量分别占40±8,48±18,53±4和65±26%的西安,北京,上海和广州的非化石OC。不包括初级生物质燃烧的其他非化石源主要归因于来自非化石前体的二次有机碳(SoC),例如生物质燃烧的排放。对于每个网站,我们还根据颗粒物质的质量将样品与中度较严重污染的日子进行比较。尽管在大量污染事件期间,在化石和非化石源的初级排放绝对浓度的显着增加,但它们对TC的相对贡献甚至减少,而SoC的一部分在所有地点始终如一地增加。该观察结果表明,SoC在中国阴霾发作期间的碳质气溶胶增量是一个重要的分数。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号