首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Primary emissions of glyoxal and methylglyoxal from laboratory measurements of open biomass burning
【24h】

Primary emissions of glyoxal and methylglyoxal from laboratory measurements of open biomass burning

机译:开放生物质燃烧实验室测量的乙醛和甲基乙二醛的初级排放

获取原文
           

摘要

We report the emissions of glyoxal and methylglyoxal from the open burning of biomass during the NOAA-led 2016 FIREX intensive at the Fire Sciences Laboratory in Missoula, MT. Both compounds were measured using cavity-enhanced spectroscopy, which is both more sensitive and more selective than methods previously used to determine emissions of these two compounds. A total of 75 burns were conducted, using 33 different fuels in 8 different categories, providing a far more comprehensive dataset for emissions than was previously available. Measurements of methylglyoxal using our instrument suffer from spectral interferences from several other species, and the values reported here are likely underestimates, possibly by as much as 70%. Methylglyoxal emissions were 2–3 times higher than glyoxal emissions on a molar basis, in contrast to previous studies that report methylglyoxal emissions lower than glyoxal emissions. Methylglyoxal emission ratios for all fuels averaged 3.6±2.4ppbv?methylglyoxal(ppmv?CO)?1, while emission factors averaged 0.66±0.50g?methylglyoxal(kg?fuel?burned)?1. Primary emissions of glyoxal from biomass burning were much lower than previous laboratory measurements but consistent with recent measurements from aircraft. Glyoxal emission ratios for all fuels averaged 1.4±0.7ppbv?glyoxal(ppmv?CO)?1, while emission factors averaged 0.20±0.12g?glyoxal(kg?fuel?burned)?1, values that are at least a factor of 4 lower than assumed in previous estimates of the global glyoxal budget. While there was significant variability in the glyoxal emission ratios and factors between the different fuel groups, glyoxal and formaldehyde were highly correlated during the course of any given fire, and the ratio of glyoxal to formaldehyde, RGF, was consistent across many different fuel types, with an average value of 0.068±0.018. While RGF values for fresh emissions were consistent across many fuel types, further work is required to determine how this value changes as the emissions age.
机译:我们在Mistousa的火灾科学实验室的NOAA-LED 2016 Firex密集型期间从生物量开放燃烧的糖醛和甲基乙二醛排放。使用腔增强的光谱法测量两种化合物,其比以前用于确定这两个化合物的排放的方法更敏感和更具选择性。在8种不同类别中使用33种不同的燃料进行了总共75个烧伤,为排放提供了比以前可用的更全面的排放数据集。使用我们的仪器的甲基乙醛测量来自几种其他物种的光谱干扰,这里报道的值可能低估,可能低至70%。与先前的研究相比,甲基乙醛排放比摩尔基底为高于乙醛排放量的2-3倍,以至于之前的研究报告了低于乙醛排放的甲基乙醛排放。所有燃料的甲基甘油氧排放率平均为3.6±2.4ppbv?甲基乙醛(PPMVαCO)?1,而排放因子平均为0.66±0.50g?甲基乙醛(kg?燃料?烧伤)?1。来自生物质燃烧的乙二醛的初级排放远低于以前的实验室测量,但与最近的飞机测量一致。所有燃料的糖醛排放率平均1.4±0.7ppbv?乙二醛(ppmv?co)?1,而排放因子平均为0.20±0.12g?乙二醛(kg?燃料?烧伤)?1,至少为4倍的值低于全球血型预算的先前估计值。虽然在任何给定的火灾过程中,在不同燃料组的血昔群排放比和不同燃料基团之间的因素中具有显着的变化,但在任何给定的火灾过程中,乙二醛和甲醛的比例在许多不同的燃料类型中一致,乙醛与甲醛的比例一致。平均值为0.068±0.018。虽然新鲜排放的RGF值在许多燃料类型中一致,但需要进一步的工作来确定该值如何随着排放年龄而变化。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号