首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Correlation slopes of GEM / CO, GEM / CO2, and GEM / CH4 and estimated mercury emissions in China, South Asia, the Indochinese Peninsula, and Central Asia derived from observations in northwestern and southwestern China
【24h】

Correlation slopes of GEM / CO, GEM / CO2, and GEM / CH4 and estimated mercury emissions in China, South Asia, the Indochinese Peninsula, and Central Asia derived from observations in northwestern and southwestern China

机译:GEM / CO,GEM / CO2和GEM / CH4的相关性倾斜和中国,南亚,吲哚代益半岛和中国西南部观察中南亚和中亚的估计汞排放

获取原文
           

摘要

Correlation analyses between atmospheric mercury (Hg) and other trace gases are useful for identification of sources and constraining regional Hg emissions. Emissions of Hg in Asia contribute significantly to the global budget of atmospheric Hg. However, due to the lack of reliable data on the source strength, large uncertainties remain in the emission inventories of Hg in Asia. In the present study, we calculated the correlation slopes of GEM / CO, GEM / CO2, and GEM / CH4 for mainland China, South Asia, the Indochinese Peninsula, and Central Asia using the ground-based observations at three remote sites in northwestern and southwestern China, and applied these values to estimate GEM emissions in the four source regions. The geometric mean GEM / CO correlation slopes for mainland China, South Asia, the Indochinese Peninsula, and Central Asia were 7.3 ± 4.3, 7.8 ± 6.4, 7.8 ± 5.0, and 13.4 ± 9.5 pg m?3 ppb?1, respectively, and values in the same source regions were 33.3 ± 30.4, 27.4 ± 31.0, 23.5 ± 15.3, and 20.5 ± 10.0 pg m?3 ppb?1 for the GEM / CH4 correlation slopes, respectively. The geometric means of GEM / CO2 correlation slopes for mainland China, South Asia, and Central Asia were 240 ± 119, 278 ± 164, 315 ± 289 pg m?3 ppm?1, respectively. These values were the first reported correlation slopes of GEM / CO, GEM / CO2, and GEM / CH4 in four important source regions of Asia, not including the GEM / CO ratios in mainland China. The correlation slopes of GEM / CO, GEM / CO2, and GEM / CH4 in Asia were relatively higher than those observed in Europe, North America, and South Africa, which may highlight GEM emissions from non-ferrous smelting, large-scale and artisanal mercury and gold production, natural sources, and historically deposited mercury (re-emission) in Asia. Using the observed GEM / CO and GEM / CO2 slopes, and the recently reported emission inventories of CO and CO2, the annual GEM emissions in mainland China, South Asia, the Indochinese Peninsula, and Central Asia were estimated to be in the ranges of 1071–1187, 340–470, 125, and 54–90 t, respectively. The estimated quantity of GEM emissions from the GEM / CH4 correlation slopes is significantly larger, which may be due to the larger uncertainties in CH4 emissions in Asia as well as insufficient observations of GEM / CH4 correlation slopes, therefore leading to an overestimate of GEM emissions. Our estimates of GEM emissions in the four Asian regions were significantly higher (3–4 times) than the anthropogenic GEM emissions reported in recent studies. This discrepancy could come from a combination of reasons including underestimates of anthropogenic and natural GEM emissions; large uncertainties related to CO, CO2, and CH4 emission inventories; and inherent limitations of the correlation slope method.
机译:大气汞(HG)和其他痕量气体之间的相关性分析可用于鉴定来源和约束区域HG排放。亚洲汞排放促进了全球大气汞的预算贡献。然而,由于缺乏对源强度的可靠数据,亚洲HG的排放清单中仍然存在大的不确定性。在本研究中,我们计算了Gem / Co,Gem / Co2和Gem / Ch4的相关性斜坡,用于中国大陆,南亚,吲哚靛蓝半岛和中亚,在西北三个远程位点使用地面观测中国西南部,并将这些价值应用于四个源地区的宝石排放。中国大陆,南亚,吲哚代益半岛和中亚的几何平均宝石/ CO相关斜坡分别为7.3±4.3,7.8±6.4,7.8±5.0和13.4±9.5 pg m?3 ppb?1,和同一源区中的值分别为33.3±30.4,27.4±31.0,23.5±15.3和20.5±10.0pg m?3 ppbα1,用于宝石/ ch4相关斜率。中国大陆,南亚和中亚的宝石/二氧化碳相关斜坡的几何手段分别为240±119,278±164,315±289 pg m?3 ppm?1。这些值是亚洲四个重要源地区的宝石/ CO,GEM / CO2和GEM / CH4的第一个报告的相关性斜坡,不包括中国大陆的宝石/共同比率。亚洲的宝石/ CO,GEM / CO2和GEM / CH4的相关性斜率比欧洲,北美和南非观察到的彼此相对较高,这可能突出来自有色金属冶炼,大规模和手工的GEM排放亚洲水星和金生产,自然来源,历史上沉积亚洲的汞(再排放)。使用观察到的宝石/公司和宝石/二氧化碳斜坡,最近报告的CO和CO2的排放清单,中国大陆,南亚,吲哚代盟半岛和中亚的年度宝石排放量估计为1071的范围-1187,340-470,125和54-90 t。宝石/ CH4相关斜率的GEM排放量的估计数量显着较大,这可能是由于亚洲的CH4排放中的更大的不确定性以及GEM / CH4相关斜率的不充分观察,因此导致GEM排放量高估。我们对四个亚洲地区的宝石排放估计明显高(3-4倍),而不是最近研​​究报告的人为宝石排放。这种差异可能来自包括低估人为和天然宝石排放的原因的组合;与CO,CO2和CH4排放库存相关的大不确定性;相关斜率法的固有局限性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号