首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Representation of the equatorial stratopause semiannual oscillation in global atmospheric reanalyses
【24h】

Representation of the equatorial stratopause semiannual oscillation in global atmospheric reanalyses

机译:全球大气排雷中赤道地层半振荡的代表

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper reports on a?project to compare the representation of the semiannual oscillation (SAO) in the equatorial stratosphere and lower mesosphere within six major global atmospheric reanalysis datasets and with recent satellite Sounding of the Atmosphere Using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) and Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) observations. All reanalyses have a?good representation of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) in the equatorial lower and middle stratosphere and each displays a?clear SAO centered near the stratopause. However, the differences among reanalyses are much more substantial in the SAO region than in the QBO-dominated region. The degree of disagreement among the reanalyses is characterized by the standard deviation (SD) of the monthly mean zonal wind and temperature; this depends on latitude, longitude, height, and time. The zonal wind SD displays a?prominent equatorial maximum that increases with height, while the temperature SD reaches a minimum near the Equator and is largest in the polar regions. Along the Equator, the zonal wind SD is smallest around the longitude of Singapore, where consistently high-quality near-equatorial radiosonde observations are available. Interestingly, the near-Singapore minimum in SD is evident to at least ~3hPa, i.e., considerably higher than the usual ~10hPa ceiling for in situ radiosonde observations. Our measurement of the agreement among the reanalyses shows systematic improvement over the period considered (1980–2016), up to near the stratopause. Characteristics of the SAO at 1hPa, such as its detailed time variation and the displacement off the Equator of the zonal wind SAO amplitude maximum, differ significantly among the reanalyses. Disagreement among the reanalyses becomes still greater above 1hPa. One of the reanalyses in our study also has a?version produced without assimilating satellite observations, and a?comparison of the SAO in these two versions demonstrates the very great importance of satellite-derived temperatures in the realistic analysis of the tropical upper stratospheric circulation.
机译:本文报告了a?项目将赤道平流层和较低介质圈在六主要的全球大气再分析数据集中的半年振荡(Sao)的代表进行比较,并使用宽带排放辐射测定(Saber)和微波肢体最近的卫星响起的卫星响应LOUSEER(MLS)观察。所有Reanalyses都有一个?赤道和中间平流层中的准双年振荡(QBO)的良好表示,每个都显示出一个透明的SAO在Stratopause附近。然而,在QBO主导地区的SAO区中,Reanalyses之间的差异更为重要。 Reanalyses之间的分歧程度的特征在于月平均危险和温度的标准偏差(SD);这取决于纬度,经度,高度和时间。 Zonal Wind SD显示出突出的赤道最大值,其高度增加,而温度SD达到赤道附近最小,并且在极地区域中最大。沿赤道沿着赤道,围绕新加坡的经度最小,在那里提供始终如一的高质量接近赤道无线电探测器观察。有趣的是,SD中的近新加坡最小值至少〜3HPa,即大约3HPA,即用于原位无线电探测器观察的常规〜10HPA天花板。我们对Reanalyses之间的协议的衡量显示,在考虑(1980-2016)的期间,靠近Stratopause的时期,系统改善。 1HPA在1HPA的SAO特性,例如其详细的时间变化和赤道的赤道的位移最大,在Reanalyses中有显着差异。 Reanalyses中的分歧仍然高于1HPa。我们研究中的一个Reanalyses也有一个没有吸收卫星观察的版本,而且它在这两个版本中对SAO的比较表明了卫星衍生的温度在热带上层循环的现实分析中非常重要。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号