首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Combining visible and infrared radiometry and lidar data to test simulations in clear and ice cloud conditions
【24h】

Combining visible and infrared radiometry and lidar data to test simulations in clear and ice cloud conditions

机译:将可见光和红外辐射辐射测定和激光雷达数据结合在清晰冰云条件下测试模拟

获取原文
           

摘要

Measurements taken during the 2003 Pacific THORPEX Observing System Test (P-TOST) by the MODIS Airborne Simulator (MAS), the Scanning High-resolution Interferometer Sounder (S-HIS) and the Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL) are compared to simulations performed with a line-by-line and multiple scattering modeling methodology (LBLMS). Formerly used for infrared hyper-spectral data analysis, LBLMS has been extended to the visible and near infrared with the inclusion of surface bi-directional reflectance properties. A number of scenes are evaluated: two clear scenes, one with nadir geometry and one cross-track encompassing sun glint, and three cloudy scenes, all with nadir geometry. CPL data is used to estimate the particulate optical depth at 532 nm for the clear and cloudy scenes and cloud upper and lower boundaries. Cloud optical depth is retrieved from S-HIS infrared window radiances, and it agrees with CPL values, to within natural variability. MAS data are simulated convolving high resolution radiances. The paper discusses the results of the comparisons for the clear and cloudy cases. LBLMS clear simulations agree with MAS data to within 20% in the shortwave (SW) and near infrared (NIR) spectrum and within 2 K in the infrared (IR) range. It is shown that cloudy sky simulations using cloud parameters retrieved from IR radiances systematically underestimate the measured radiance in the SW and NIR by nearly 50%, although the IR retrieved optical thickness agree with same measured by CPL. MODIS radiances measured from Terra are also compared to LBLMS simulations in cloudy conditions, using retrieved cloud optical depth and effective radius from MODIS, to understand the origin for the observed discrepancies. It is shown that the simulations agree, to within natural variability, with measurements in selected MODIS SW bands. The impact of the assumed particles size distribution and vertical profile of ice content on results is evaluated. Sensitivity is much smaller than differences between measured and simulated radiances in the SW and NIR. The paper dwells on a possible explanation of these contradictory results, involving the phase function of ice particles in the shortwave.
机译:通过MODIS空中模拟器(MAS),扫描高分辨率干涉仪发声器(S-HIS)和云物理LIDAR(CPL)进行测量,以期在2003太平洋索普斯观察系统测试(P-TOCT)中进行的测量。与使用的模拟进行比较逐行和多个散射建模方法(LBLMS)。以前用于红外超光谱数据分析,LBLMS已经延伸到可见的和近红外,包括表面双向反射特性。评估了许多场景:两个清晰的场景,一个带有Nadir几何和一个跨轨道,包括太阳闪光,以及三个多云场景,都带有Nadir几何。 CPL数据用于估计532nm的微粒光学深度,用于透明和阴天场景和云上限和下边界。从S-HIS红外线窗口放射检索云光学深度,并同意CPL值,以在自然变化中。 MAS数据是模拟卷积高分辨率的边缘。本文讨论了明确和阴天案件的比较结果。 LBLMS清晰的模拟在短波(SW)和近红外(NIR)频谱中的20%内的MAS数据与红外(IR)范围内的2 k内相提并论。结果表明,使用从IR辐射检索的云参数系统地低估了SW和NIR中的测量辐射的多云天空模拟,尽管IR检索的光学厚度与CPL测量相同。从Terra测量的Modis RadiaCES也与MODIS的检索到云光学深度和有效半径一起测量的MODIS放射,以了解所观察到的差异的原点。结果表明,模拟同意,在自然变化中,在选定的MODIS SW频带中测量。评估了假定粒子尺寸分布和冰含量垂直轮廓对结果的影响。灵敏度远小于SW和NIR中测量和模拟的差异之间的差异。纸张居住在可能的解释这些矛盾的结果,涉及短波中冰颗粒的相位函数。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号