首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Large differences in reanalyses of diabatic heating in the tropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere
【24h】

Large differences in reanalyses of diabatic heating in the tropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere

机译:热带上层对流层和较低平流层中的糖尿病加热的重新分析大差异

获取原文
           

摘要

We present the time mean heat budgets of the tropical upper troposphere (UT) and lower stratosphere (LS) as simulated by five reanalysis models: the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA), European Reanalysis (ERA-Interim), Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), Japanese 25-yr Reanalysis and Japan Meteorological Agency Climate Data Assimilation System (JRA-25/JCDAS), and National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) Reanalysis 1. The simulated diabatic heat budget in the tropical UTLS differs significantly from model to model, with substantial implications for representations of transport and mixing. Large differences are apparent both in the net heat budget and in all comparable individual components, including latent heating, heating due to radiative transfer, and heating due to parameterised vertical mixing. We describe and discuss the most pronounced differences. Discrepancies in latent heating reflect continuing difficulties in representing moist convection in models. Although these discrepancies may be expected, their magnitude is still disturbing. We pay particular attention to discrepancies in radiative heating (which may be surprising given the strength of observational constraints on temperature and tropospheric water vapour) and discrepancies in heating due to turbulent mixing (which have received comparatively little attention). The largest differences in radiative heating in the tropical UTLS are attributable to differences in cloud radiative heating, but important systematic differences are present even in the absence of clouds. Local maxima in heating and cooling due to parameterised turbulent mixing occur in the vicinity of the tropical tropopause.
机译:我们展示了热带上层(UT)和较低的平直层(LS)的时间平均热预算,如五次重新分析模型的模拟:研究和应用的现代化回顾性分析(Merra),欧洲重新分析(ERA-INSIM),气候预测系统重新分析(CFSR),日本25岁次分析和日本气象局气候数据同化系统(JRA-25 / JCDA),以及国家环境预测/国家大气研究中心的国家中心(NCEP / NCAR)Reanalysis 1.该热带UTL中的模拟蛋白热预算与模型的模型显着不同,对运输和混合的表示具有重要意义。在净热预算和所有可比较的单个部件中,包括潜热,由于辐射转移而加热,并且由于参数化的垂直混合而加热,差异很大。我们描述并讨论了最明显的差异。潜伏的差异反映了在模型中代表潮湿对流的持续困难。虽然可以预期这些差异,但它们的幅度仍然令人不安。我们特别注意辐射加热中的差异(鉴于温度和对流层水蒸气的观察限制的强度可能是令人惊讶的,并且由于湍流混合而导致的加热差异(这对关注相对较少)。热带UTL中辐射加热的最大差异可归因于云辐射加热的差异,但即使在没有云的情况下也存在重要的系统差异。由于参数化的湍流混合,在热带对象的附近发生了加热和冷却中的局部最大值。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号