首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions >Emissions from village cookstoves in Haryana, India, and their potential impacts on air quality
【24h】

Emissions from village cookstoves in Haryana, India, and their potential impacts on air quality

机译:来自印度哈里亚纳邦的村庄厨师的排放及其对空气质量的潜在影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Air quality in rural India is impacted by residential cooking and heating with biomass fuels. In this study, emissions of CO, CO2, and 76?volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) were quantified to better understand the relationship between cook fire emissions and ambient ozone and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation. Cooking was carried out by a local cook, and traditional dishes were prepared on locally built chulha or angithi cookstoves using brushwood or dung fuels. Cook fire emissions were collected throughout the cooking event in a Kynar bag (VOCs) and on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filters (PM2.5). Gas samples were transferred from a Kynar bag to previously evacuated stainless-steel canisters and analyzed using gas chromatography coupled to flame ionization, electron capture, and mass spectrometry detectors. VOC emission factors were calculated from the measured mixing ratios using the carbon-balance method, which assumes that all carbon in the fuel is converted to CO2, CO, VOCs, and PM2.5 when the fuel is burned. Filter samples were weighed to calculate PM2.5 emission factors. Dung fuels and angithi cookstoves resulted in significantly higher emissions of most VOCs (p0.05). Utilizing dung–angithi cook fires resulted in twice as much of the measured VOCs compared to dung–chulha and 4 times as much as brushwood–chulha, with 84.0, 43.2, and 17.2g measured VOCkg?1 fuel carbon, respectively. This matches expectations, as the use of dung fuels and angithi cookstoves results in lower modified combustion efficiencies compared to brushwood fuels and chulha cookstoves. Alkynes and benzene were exceptions and had significantly higher emissions when cooking using a chulha as opposed to an angithi with dung fuel (for example, benzene emission factors were 3.18gkg?1 fuel carbon for dung–chulha and 2.38gkg?1 fuel carbon for dung–angithi). This study estimated that 3 times as much SOA and ozone in the maximum incremental reactivity (MIR) regime may be produced from dung–chulha as opposed to brushwood–chulha cook fires. Aromatic compounds dominated as SOA precursors from all types of cook fires, but benzene was responsible for the majority of SOA formation potential from all chulha cook fire VOCs, while substituted aromatics were more important for dung–angithi. Future studies should investigate benzene exposures from different stove and fuel combinations and model SOA formation from cook fire VOCs to verify public health and air quality impacts from cook fires.
机译:空气质量在印度农村地区由居民做饭和取暖用的生物质燃料的影响。在这项研究中,CO,CO 2和76?的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)和细颗粒物(PM2.5)的排放量进行定量,以更好地理解烹调火排放和环境臭氧和二次有机气溶胶(SOA)的形成之间的关系。烹饪是由当地的厨师进行,并在当地建造chulha或使用草丛或粪便燃料angithi锅灶准备的传统菜肴。库克火灾排放量始终在Kynar聚袋(挥发性有机化合物)的烹调事件和聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)过滤器(PM2.5)收集。气体样品从一个的Kynar袋预先抽真空的不锈钢罐转移并使用耦合到火焰离子化,电子捕获,和质谱检测器的气相色谱进行分析。 VOC排放因子从使用碳平衡法,其中假定在燃料所有碳被转化成C​​O 2所测量的混合比来计算,CO,挥发性有机化合物,并且当燃料燃烧PM2.5。过滤样品,称重,计算PM2.5排放因子。阮晋勇燃料和angithi锅灶导致大多数的VOC(P0.05)的显著更高的排放。利用粪angithi厨师火灾造成两倍相比粪chulha所测量的VOC和4倍之多草丛-chulha的,具有84.0,43.2,和17.2克测量VOCkg?1燃料的碳,分别。此匹配的期望,因为使用粪燃料和在相比草丛燃料和chulha锅灶下改性燃烧效率angithi锅灶的结果。炔烃和苯有例外,并使用相对于与粪燃料的angithi一个chulha烹调时有显著更高的排放(例如,苯排放系数3.18gkg吗?粪chulha和2.38gkg 1个燃料碳吗?粪1个燃料碳-angithi)。这项研究估计,3倍的最大增量反应性(MIR)制度多SOA和臭氧可以从粪chulha来制造,而不是灌木-chulha煮火灾。芳族化合物为主从所有类型的煮火灾SOA前体,但苯负责从所有的多数SOA形成潜在的chulha煮火灾的VOC,而取代芳烃是对粪angithi更重要。未来的研究应调查来自不同炉和燃料组合,并从厨师火的VOC模型SOA形成苯暴露于库克火灾核实公众健康和空气质量的影响。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号