首页> 外文期刊>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention >Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of EFGR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Monotherapy with Standard Second-line Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of EFGR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Monotherapy with Standard Second-line Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:EFGR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂单疗法与预先治疗的非小细胞肺癌标准二线化疗的疗效和安全性比较:系统综述和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitormonotherapy (EFGR-TKIs: gefitinib or erlotinib) with standard second-line chemotherapy (single agent docetaxel or pemetrexed) in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We systematically searched for randomized clinical trials that compared EGFR-TKI monotherapy with standard second-line chemotherapy in previously treated advanced NSCLC. The end points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), 1-year survival rate (1-year SR) and grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR), with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials. Results: Eight randomized controlled trials (totally 3218 patients) were eligible. Our meta-analysis results showed that EGFR-TKIs were comparable to standard second-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in terms of overall survival (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.92-1.10; p=0.943), progression-free survival (HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.75-1.08, P=0.258) and 1-year-survival rate (RR 0.97, 95%CI 0.87-1.08, P=0.619), and the overall response rate was higher in patients who receiving EGFR-TKIs(RR 1.50, 95%CI 1.22-1.83, P=0.000). Sub-group analysis demonstrated that EGFR-TKI monotherapy significantly improved PFS (HR 0.73, 95%CI: 0.55-0.97, p=0.03) and ORR (RR 1.96, 95%CI: 1.46-2.63, p=0.000) in East Asian patients, but it did not translate into increase in OS and 1-year SR. Furthermore, there were fewer incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and neutrotoxicity in EGFR-TKI monotherapy group, excluding grade 3 or 4 rash. Conclusion: Both interventions had comparable efficacy as second-line treatments for patients with advanced NSCLC, and EGFR-TKI monotherapy was associated with less toxicity and better tolerability. Moreover, our data also demonstrated that EGFR-TKImonotherapy tended to be more effective in East Asian patients in terms of PFS and ORR compared with standard second-line chemotherapy. These results should help inform decisions about patient management and design of future trials.
机译:目的:将表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制(EFGR-TKIS:Gefitinib或Erlotinib)的疗效和安全性与标准的二线化疗(单药剂多西紫杉醇或培养基)进行了预先治疗的先前治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌( NSCLC)。方法:我们系统地搜索了随机临床试验,将EGFR-TKI单药治疗与预先治疗的先进的NSCLC进行标准的第二线化疗。终点是整体存活(OS),无进展生存(PFS),总反应率(ORR),1年生存率(1年SR)和3级或4级毒性。汇集危险比(HR)或风险比(RR),其相应的95%置型间隔(CI)根据包括试验的异质性而采用固定或随机效应模型计算。结果:八项随机对照试验(共3218名患者)符合条件。我们的荟萃分析结果表明,在整体存活方面,EGFR-TKI与先进的NSCLC的标准二线化疗相当(HR 1.00,95%CI 0.92-1.10; p = 0.943),无进展生存(HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.75-1.08,P = 0.258)和1岁生存率(RR 0.97,95%CI 0.87-1.08,P = 0.619),接受EGFR-TKIS的患者(RR 1.50,95%CI 1.22-1.83,P = 0.000)。子组分析证明EGFR-TKI单一疗法显着改善PFS(HR 0.73,95%CI:0.55-0.97,P = 0.03)和ORR(RR 1.96,95%CI:1.46-2.63,P = 0.000)患者,但它没有转化为OS和1年SR的增加。此外,在EGFR-TKI单疗法组中,少3级或4级中性粒细胞病,Feberile Neucopenia和Neutrootoxicity的发生率较少,不包括3级或4级皮疹。结论:两种干预措施与高级NSCLC患者的二线治疗相当,EGFR-TKI单药治疗与毒性较小和更好的耐受性有关。此外,我们的数据还表明,与标准二线化疗相比,EGFR-TKIMON治疗在东亚患者方面往往更有效。这些结果应有助于为患者管理和设计的决策提供可供选择的未来试验的决策。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号