...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention >Tobacco Use and Quit Behaviour Assessment in the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS): Invalid Responses and Implications
【24h】

Tobacco Use and Quit Behaviour Assessment in the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS): Invalid Responses and Implications

机译:在全球成人烟草调查(GATS)中的烟草使用和退出行为评估:无效的响应和含义

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Tobacco use and quit attempts are two key indicators of the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) that assess quit attempts among current as well as former tobacco users. The relevant data have inherent policy implications for tobacco cessation programme evaluation. This study aimed to review the concepts of quit attempt assessment and quantifying invalid responses considering GATS-India data. Materials and Methods: GATS assessment of tobacco use and quit attempts were examined in the current literature. Two categories of invalid responses were identified by stratified analysis of the duration of last quit attempt among current users and duration of abstinence among former users. Category A included absolute invalid responses when time-frame of assessment of current tobacco use and less than former tobacco use were violated. Category B included responses that violated the unit of measurement of time. Results: Current daily use, current less than daily use and former use in GATS were imprecisely defined with overlapping of time-frame of assessment. Overall responses of 3,102 current smokers, 4,036 current smokeless users, 1,904 former smokers and 1,343 former smokeless users were analyzed to quantify invalid responses. Analysis indicated overall 21.2% (category A: 7.32%; category B: 17.7%) and 22.7% (category A: 8.05%; category B: 18.1%) invalid responses among current smokers and smokeless users respectively regarding their duration of last quit attempt. Similarly overall 6.62% (category A: 4.7%; category B: 2.3%) and 10.6% (category A: 8.6%; category B: 3.5%) invalid responses were identified among former smokers and smokeless users respectively regarding their duration of abstinence. Conclusions: High invalid responses for a single assessment are due to the imprecise definition of current use, former use and quit attempt; and failure to utilize opportunity of direct data entry interface use during the survey to validate responses instantly. Redefining tobacco use and quit attempts considering an appropriate timeframe would reduce invalid responses.
机译:背景:烟草使用和退出尝试是全球成人烟草调查(GATS)的两个关键指标,可评估当前的戒断尝试以及前烟草用户。相关数据具有对烟草停止计划评估的内在策略影响。本研究旨在审查戒烟尝试评估的概念,并考虑GATS-India数据量化无效响应。材料和方法:在目前文献中检测了GATS评估烟草使用和戒烟的尝试。通过对当前用户的最后退出尝试持续时间和前用户之间的禁欲期的持续时间来识别两类无效响应。类别a包括绝对无效何时违反当前烟草使用的时间帧并且少于前烟草使用时的时间框架。 B类包括违反时间单位的响应。结果:目前日常使用,电流不到日常使用,以前在GATS中使用的是,通过重叠的评估时间框架重叠定义。 3,102次当前吸烟者的整体回复,目前无烟用户4,036名,1,904名前吸烟者和1,343名以前的无烟用户进行了分析,以量化无效的反应。分析总体分析21.2%(a:7.32%; b:17.7%类别)和22.7%(a:8.05%类别b:18.1%)在当前吸烟者和无烟用户分别对最后退出尝试持续时间的响应无效。同样为6.62%(A类:4.7%); B:2.3%类别)和10.6%(A类:8.6%),以前的吸烟者和无烟用户在禁止期间确定了无效的响应。结论:对单一评估的高无效响应是由于当前使用的不精确定义,以前使用和退出尝试;在调查期间未能利用直接数据输入界面使用的机会,以立即验证响应。考虑适当的时间帧,重新定义烟草使用并退出尝试将减少无效的响应。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号