首页> 外文期刊>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention >CEA, AFP, CA125, CA153 and CA199 in Malignant Pleural Effusions Predict the Cause
【24h】

CEA, AFP, CA125, CA153 and CA199 in Malignant Pleural Effusions Predict the Cause

机译:在恶性胸腔积液中CEA,AFP,CA125,CA153和CA199预测了原因

获取原文
       

摘要

Determination of the cause of malignant pleural effusions is important for treatment and management, especially in cases of unknown primaries. There are limited biomarkers available for prediction of the cause of malignant pleural effusion in clinical practice. Hence, we evaluated pleural levels of five tumor biomarkers (CEA, AFP, CA125, CA153 and CA199) in predicting the cause of malignant pleural effusion in a retrospective study. Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney U tests were carried out to compare levels of tumor markers in pleural effusion among different forms of neoplasia - lung squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or small cell carcinoma, mesothelioma, breast cancer, lymphoma/leukemia and miscellaneous. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of biomarkers. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences in levels of pleural effusion CEA (P 0.05), among the seven groups. Receiver operator characteristic analysis showed that, compared with other four tumor markers, CA153 was the best biomarker in diagnosing malignant pleural effusions of lung adenocarcinoma (area under curve (AUC): 0.838 (95%confidence interval: 0.787, 0.888); cut-off value: 10.2U/ml; sensitivity: 73.2% (64.4-80.8)%, specificity: 85.2% (77.8-90.8)%), lung squamous cell carcinoma (AUC: 0.716 (0.652, 0.780); cut-off value: 14.2U/ml; sensitivity: 57.6% (50.7-64.3)%, specificity: 91.2% (76.3-98.0)%), and small-cell lung cancer (AUC: 0.812 (0.740, 0.884); cut-off value: 9.7U/ml; sensitivity: 61.5% (55.0-67.8)%, specificity: 94.1% (71.2-99.0)%); CEA was the best biomarker in diagnosing MPEs of mesothelioma (AUC: 0.726 (0.593, 0.858); cut-off value: 1.43ng/ml; sensitivity: 83.7% (78.3-88.2)%, specificity: 61.1% (35.8-82.6)%) and lymphoma/leukemia (AUC: 0.923 (0.872, 0.974); cut-off value: 1.71ng/ml; sensitivity: 82.8% (77.4-87.3)%, specificity: 92.3% (63.9-98.7)%). Thus CA153 and CEA appear to be good biomarkers in diagnosing different causes of malignant pleural effusion. Our findings implied that the two tumor markers may improve the diagnosis and treatment for effusions of unknown primaries.
机译:恶性胸腔积液的原因的测定对于治疗和管理是重要的,特别是在未知原初级的情况下。有限的生物标志物可用于预测临床实践中恶性胸腔积液的原因。因此,我们评估了五种肿瘤生物标志物(CEA,AFP,CA125,Ca153和Ca199)的胸腔水平,以预测回顾性研究中恶性胸腔积液的原因。进行Kruskal-Wallis或Mann-Whitney U测试,以比较不同形式的肿瘤鳞状细胞癌,腺癌或小细胞癌,间皮瘤,乳腺癌,淋巴瘤/白血病和杂项的胸腔积液中胸腔积液中肿瘤标志物的水平。进行接收器操作员特征分析以评估生物标志物的敏感性和特异性。 Kruskal-Wallis试验表现出七组胸腔积液CEA水平的显着差异。接收器操作员特征分析表明,与其他四种肿瘤标志物相比,Ca153是诊断肺腺癌恶性胸膜血肿(曲线区域)的最佳生物标志物(曲线下):0.838(95%置信区间:0.787,0.888);截止值:10.2u / ml;敏感性:73.2%(64.4-80.8)%,特异性:85.2%(77.8-90.8)%),肺鳞状细胞癌(AUC:0.716(0.652,0.780);截止值:14.2 U / ml;敏感性:57.6%(50.7-64.3)%,特异性:91.2%(76.3-98.0)%)和小细胞肺癌(AUC:0.812(0.740,0.884);截止值:9.7U / ml;敏感性:61.5%(55.0-67.8)%,特异性:94.1%(71.2-99.0)%); CEA是诊断间皮瘤MPES的最佳生物标志物(AUC:0.726(0.593,0.858);截止值:1.43ng / ml;敏感性:83.7%(78.3-88.2)%,特异性:61.1%(35.8-82.6) %)和淋巴瘤/白血病(AUC:0.923(0.872,0.974);截止值:1.71ng / ml;敏感性:82.8%(77.4-87.3)%,特异性:92.3%(63.9-98.7)%)。因此,CA153和CEA似乎是诊断恶性胸腔积液的不同原因的良好生物标志物。我们的研究结果暗示两种肿瘤标志物可以改善未知初学者的诊断和治疗。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号