首页> 外文期刊>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention >Heaviness of Smoking Index, Number of Cigarettes Smoked and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Among Adult Male Malaysians
【24h】

Heaviness of Smoking Index, Number of Cigarettes Smoked and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Among Adult Male Malaysians

机译:吸烟指数的沉重,烟熏的数量和成年男性马来西亚人的尼古丁依赖的Fagerstrom试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Two methods of identifying smokers with high nicotine dependence, the heaviness of smoking index (HSI) and number of cigarettes per day (CPD) were compared with the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence (FTND). The HSI, CPD and the FTND were administered to 316 adult Malaysian male, daily smokers aged between 25-64 years old in the Malaysian NCD Surveillance-1 Survey using a two-stage stratified random sampling of enumeration blocks and living quarters, via an interview based on a validated questionnaire. The cut-off point for classification of high nicotine dependence on the HSI was a score of four or higher, and for the heavy smoking category, smoking more than 20 cigarettes per day. Classification using each method was compared with classification by the FTND (score of six or more) as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity and kappa statistics for concordance between both measures and the FTND were evaluated. The HSI gave a similar prevalence rate of high nicotine dependence as the FTND. There was substantial agreement between the HSI and the FTND (kappa=0.63.), with moderate sensitivity (69.8%) and high specificity (92.5%). However, prevalence of high nicotine dependence using the CPD was 7% lower than the FTND. The heavy smoking category also showed fair agreement with the FTND (kappa=0.45) and moderate sensitivity (67.0%), but specificity was high (86.9%). The findings indicate that the HSI can be used as an alternative to the FTND in screening for high nicotine dependence among daily smokers in large population-based studies, while CPD may not be a suitable alternative to the FTND.
机译:识别与高尼古丁依赖吸烟者两种方法,吸烟指数(HSI)和每天(CPD)的香烟数目的沉重与Fagerstrom测试尼古丁依赖(FTND)进行了比较。恒指,CPD和FTND分别给予316马来西亚成年男性,年龄在25-64岁之间在马来西亚的NCD监控-1使用调查两个阶段的每日吸烟者分层枚举块和生活小区的随机抽样,通过面试基于经过验证的调查问卷。对恒指高尼古丁依赖分级的分界点是四个或更高,而对于重度吸烟类别的分数,每天吸烟超过20支。使用每个方法分类与由FTND分类进行比较(评分六个或更多个)作为参考标准。灵敏度,对于措施和FTND之间一致性的特异性和Kappa统计数据进行了评估。恒指给予了很高的尼古丁依赖作为FTND的类似的患病率。有在HSI和FTND之间基本一致(卡帕= 0.63),具有中等灵敏度(69.8%)和高特异性(92.5%)。然而,使用高CPD尼古丁依赖的患病率为7%,比FTND降低。重烟类也表现出与FTND(Kappa值= 0.45)和中度敏感性(67.0%)公平的协议,但特异性高(86.9%)。研究结果表明,在HSI可以用作筛选用于大型基于人口的研究每天吸烟者高尼古丁依赖的替代FTND,而CPD可能不是一个合适的替代FTND。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号