首页> 外文期刊>Asian journal of surgery >Early identification of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography: A randomised controlled study
【24h】

Early identification of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography: A randomised controlled study

机译:使用吲哚菁绿荧光胆管造影的腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗安全性的早期鉴定:随机对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundAchieving critical view of safety (CVS) is vital during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). There is no known study determining use of indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography (ICGFC) in early identification of CVS during LC. This study aims to compare use of ICGFC in LC against conventional LC in early identification of CVS.MethodologyPatients undergoing LC in a single centre were randomized into ICGFC-LC and conventional LC. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon and the time taken to achieve CVS from the time of gallbladder fundus retraction was measured. Difficulty level for each surgery was rated and analysed using a modified scoring system (Level 1– Easy to Level 4–Very difficult).Results63 patients were recruited where mean time (min) to achieve CVS was 22.3?±?12.9 in ICGFC-LC (n?=?30) and 22.8?±?14.3 in conventional LC (p?=?0.867). The time taken to achieve CVS was shorter in ICGFC-LC group across all difficulty levels, although not significant (p?>?0.05). No major complication was observed in the study.ConclusionsThis study had shown ICGFC-LC reduces time to CVS across all difficulty levels but not statistically significant. ICGFC-LC maybe useful in difficult LC and in surgical training.Trial registrationClinical Trials NCT04228835.Study grantUMMI Surgical – Karl Storz Distributor (Malaysia).
机译:背景安全性(CVS)的临界视图在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)期间至关重要。没有已知的研究确定使用吲哚菁绿荧光胆管造影(ICGFC)在LC期间CVS的早期鉴定使用。本研究旨在将ICGFC在LC中的使用对CVS的早期鉴定中的常规LC进行比较。在单一中心中进行LC的溶液型分泌物被随机化为ICGFC-LC和常规LC。通过单个外科医生进行手术,并测量从胆囊眼底缩回时达到CV所花费的时间。每个手术的难度水平被评定并使用修改的评分系统进行分析(1级 - 易于4级 - 非常困难)。招募患者的平均时间(min)达到CV的招募率为22.3?±12.9在ICGFC-LC中(n?=?30)和22.8?±14.3在常规LC(p?= 0.867)。在所有难度水平上,在ICGFC-LC集团中,实现CVS所需的时间虽然不显着(P?> 0.05)。在该研究中没有观察到主要的并发症.Conclusionsthis研究表明ICGFC-LC在所有难度水平上减少了CV的时间,但没有统计学意义。 ICGFC-LC可能在困难的LC和手术训练中有用.Trial rensionCrinical试验NCT04228835.Study Grantummi外科 - Karl Storz经销商(马来西亚)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号