...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian journal of surgery >Long-term outcomes following en bloc resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the head with portomesenteric venous invasion
【24h】

Long-term outcomes following en bloc resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the head with portomesenteric venous invasion

机译:在胰腺癌静脉侵袭的胰腺导管腺癌胰腺癌腺癌中的长期结果

获取原文

摘要

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to clarify the prognostic influence of venous resection of the portal vein (PV) or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) on long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the head with suspected vascular invasion.MethodsFrom May 1995 to December 2014, a total of 557 patients underwent surgery with curative intent for pancreatic cancer of the head.ResultsAmong 557 patients, 106 (19%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with PV-SMV resection and 89 (75.5%) of these patients were confirmed to have true pathological invasion. The 5-year overall survival rate in patients underwent PV-SMV resection was significantly lower compared with those who did not (18.7% versus 24.3%;p?=?0.002). Patients with negative resection margins who underwent PV-SMV resection had a better prognosis than those with positive resection margins who did not undergo PV-SMV resection with positive resection margins (17% versus 6.3% in 5-year overall survival rate;p?=?0.003). The overall morbidity rate was not significantly different between PV-SMV resection group and no PV-SMV resection group (p?=?0.064). On multivariate analysis, margin status, advanced T stage (3 or 4), lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors for survival.ConclusionPV-SMV resection was related to lower overall survival. However, on multivariate analysis, margin status was a more important prognostic factor than PV-SMV resection and true pathological invasion for survival. Therefore, en bloc PV-SMV resection should be performed when PV-SMV invasion is suspected to achieve R0 resection.
机译:背景技术本研究的目的是阐明门静脉(PV)或优质肠系膜静脉(SMV)对胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的长期结果对具有可疑血管侵袭的患者的长期结果的预后影响。方法法1995年5月至2014年12月,共有557名患者接受手术治疗胰腺癌的治疗意图。患者557名患者,106(19%)接受胰腺癌切除术(PD),PV-SMV切除和89(75.5%)这些患者被证实具有真实的病理入侵。与那些没有(18.7%对24.3%)相比,PV-SMV切除术患者的5年的总生存率明显降低(18.7%; P?= 0.002)。接受PV-SMV切除术的负切除乳头的患者具有更好的预后,而不是阳性切除射击的人没有接受PV-SMV切除的阳性切除射击(17%对5年的总生存率为6.3%; P?= ?0.003)。 PV-SMV切除组和NO PV-SMV切除组(P≤0.064)之间的整体发病率没有显着差异。在多变量分析中,边缘状态,先进的T阶段(3或4),淋巴结转移和佐剂治疗是Survival的独立预后因素.ConclusionPV-SMV切除与较低总存活有关。然而,在多变量分析上,边缘状态是比PV-SMV切除和生存的真实病理入侵更重要的预后因素。因此,当怀疑PV-SMV侵袭以实现R0切除时,应进行en Bloc PV-SMV切除。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号