首页> 外文期刊>Archives of physiotherapy. >To stimulate or not to stimulate? A rapid systematic review of repetitive sensory stimulation for the upper-limb following stroke
【24h】

To stimulate or not to stimulate? A rapid systematic review of repetitive sensory stimulation for the upper-limb following stroke

机译:刺激或不刺激?卒中后肢体重复感觉刺激的快速系统综述

获取原文
       

摘要

Repetitive sensory stimulation (RSS) is a therapeutic approach which involves repeated electrical stimulation of the skin’s surface to improve function. This rapid systematic review aimed to describe the current evidence for repetitive sensory stimulation (RSS) in rehabilitation of the upper-limb for people who have had a stroke. Methods: Relevant studies were identified in a systematic search of electronic databases and hand-searching in February 2020. The findings of included studies were synthesized to describe: the safety of RSS, in whom and when after stroke it has been used, the doses used and its effectiveness. Eight studies were included. No serious adverse events were reported. The majority of studies used RSS in participants with mild or moderate impairments and in the chronic stage after stroke. Four studies used RSS in a single treatment session, reporting significant improvements in strength and hand function. Findings from longitudinal studies showed few significant differences between control and experimental groups. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of included studies. This review suggests that there is insufficient evidence to support the use of RSS for the upper-limb after stroke in clinical practice. However, this review highlights several clear research priorities including establishing the mechanism and in whom RSS may work, its safety and optimal treatment parameters to improve function of the upper-limb after stroke.
机译:重复的感觉刺激(RSS)是一种治疗方法,涉及对皮肤表面的重复电刺激以改善功能。这种快速的系统审查旨在描述患有中风的人的重复感官刺激(RSS)的现有证据。方法:在2020年2月的电子数据库和手中搜索相关研究。综合研究的研究结果是描述:RSS的安全性,在中风后,使用卒中后,使用剂量及其有效性。包括八项研究。没有报道任何严重的不良事件。大多数研究使用了与温和或中度损伤的参与者的RSS和中风后的慢性阶段。四项研究使用了单一治疗会议中的RSS,报告了强度和手动功能的显着改善。纵向研究的结果表明,对照和实验组之间存在显着差异。由于包括研究的异质性,不可能进行META分析。该审查表明,在临床实践中,在中风后,还没有足够的证据来支持在中风后使用RSS。然而,这篇综述凸显了几个明确的研究优先事项,包括建立机制,而RSS可以工作,其安全性和最佳治疗参数,以改善中风后上肢功能。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号