首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism >Comparison of glucose measurement on dried blood spots versus plasma samples in pregnant women with and without anemia
【24h】

Comparison of glucose measurement on dried blood spots versus plasma samples in pregnant women with and without anemia

机译:血糖测量对孕妇干燥血斑与血浆样品的血浆样本

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective Compare the concordance degree between plasma glucose and glucose measurements on Dried Blood Spots (DBS) during pregnancy.Subjects and methods Glucose measurement was performed in pregnant women after a fast of 8-12 hours. Venous blood was collected with sodium fluoride, the plasma was separated, and glucose measured by the enzymatic oxidase glucose method. Capillary blood samples were collected and analyzed by DBS. For statistics, the paired Student’s t test, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), graphic approach of Altman and Bland, and survival – concordance plot were used.Results 307 pregnant women were evaluated, 88.6% without diabetes and 11.4% with previous diabetes. The glucose ranged from 66 to 190 mg/dL [3.66 to 10.55 mmol/L] in plasma and from 53 to 166 mg/dL [2.94 to 9.21 mmol/L] in DBS. The glucose average values were 88.1 ± 12 mg/dL [4.98 ± 0.67 mmol/L] in plasma and 89.2 ±11,5 mg/dL, [4.95 ± 0.64 mmol/L] in DBS – p-value = 0.084. The ICC value was moderate (0.510), and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was r = 0.507 p 0.001. Altman and Bland’s graph showed that difference between the values obtained by both methods is -24.62 to 22.3 mg/dL [-1.37 to 1.24 mmol/L]. Significant fixed bias (-1,16 average difference) and proportional bias (r = 0.056; p = 0.33) were not observed. Anemia was associated with differences between plasma glucose and DBS measurements (p = 0.031).Conclusion Capillary glucose in DBS correlates with plasma glucose; however, the methods do not present good concordance. The presence of anemia worsens this result.
机译:目的比较妊娠期间干燥血斑(DBS)对血浆葡萄糖和葡萄糖测量之间的一致程度。在8-12小时的速度下,在孕妇中进行葡萄糖测量。用氟化钠收集静脉血液,分离血浆,并通过酶氧化酶葡萄糖法测量葡萄糖。收集毛细血样样品并通过DBS分析。对于统计,使用成对的学生的T检验,互连系数(ICC),Altman和Bland的图形方法,以及生存情节。结果,评估了307名孕妇,88.6%没有糖尿病,患有以前的糖尿病11.4%。葡萄糖在等离子体中的66-190mg / dl [3.66至10.55mmol / l]范围为53至166mg / dl [2.94至9.21mmol / l]。葡萄糖平均值为88.1±12mg / dl [4.98±0.67mmol / L]等离子体,89.2±11,5 mg / dl,[4.95±0.64mmol / L],DBS - P值= 0.084。 ICC值为中等(0.510),Pearson的相关系数为r = 0.507 p <0.001。 Altman和Bland的图表表明,两种方法获得的值之间的差异为-24.62至22.3mg / dl [-1.37至1.24 mmol / l]。未观察到显着的固定偏压(-1,16平均差异)和比例偏差(r = 0.056; p = 0.33)。贫血与血浆葡萄糖和DBS测量之间的差异有关(P = 0.031)。在DBS中的合并毛细血糖与血浆葡萄糖相关;但是,这些方法并不呈现良好的一致性。贫血的存在恶化了这一结果。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号