首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >P66?Standardising strengths of unlicensed medicines in a large London hospital trust
【24h】

P66?Standardising strengths of unlicensed medicines in a large London hospital trust

机译:P66?在大型伦敦医院信托中的无牌药的标准化强度

获取原文
       

摘要

Background A UK national position statement on standardised strengths of unlicensed liquid medicines recommend that when children require unlicensed liquid medications, they should receive the recommended strength. By standardising strengths of these medicines, the risk of errors being made in the doses given to children will be reduced and prevent accidental under and overdoses. 1 Our Trust has 4 hospital sites since merging in 2012, we found the process of switching to a standard strength far from simple. Methods The strengths of unlicensed liquid medicines listed in the position statement available on the pharmacy dispensing system (JAC) were identified, along with the speciality users. Pharmacy and clinical leads were consulted for agreement to switching to the standardised strengths. Pharmacy procurement identified new products in standardised strengths and products were reviewed for suitability by paediatric pharmacist. A cost impact analysis was carried out. Communication was sent to stakeholders including, doctors, nurses, pharmacy and primary care. Results and Discussion We found the standardised strengths of azathioprine, clonazepam, ethambutol, isoniazid, melatonin, omeprazole, phenobarbitone and pyrazinamide strengths were on formulary. Clopidogrel, hydrocortisone, sertraline and tacrolimus liquids are not used. Different strengths of the listed unlicensed liquid medicines were used by different sites and specialties. Lead speciality pharmacists agreed with the standardisation. We identified use of unlicensed products where licensed products are available (sildenafil 20 mg/5 mL and furosemide 5 mg/5 mL). We added the use of these items to our review. We were not able to agree on a single standard strength for some items; the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have babies under 500 g who may require furosemide, spironolactone and sildenafil in doses that measure less than 0.1 mL using the recommended strengths. This volume is deemed less than satisfactory to be measured safely 1 . It has been agreed with the neonatal lead pharmacist that additional strengths of the sildenafil (unlicensed 20 mg/5 mL), spironolactone (unlicensed 10 mg/5 mL) and furosemide (20 mg/5 mL) be available for inpatient NICU use only. The potential for patients to be discharged on the non-standard strength is reduced by specifying ‘Not for discharge - inpatient use only’ on the pharmacy system as well as having them only as NICU stock from medicines distribution. Patients admitted on other strengths will be switched (with consent); to minimise risk pharmacists will ensure carers are aware of the change & correct dose volume to administer and endorse TTAs noting the change in concentration for the GP. Primary care have been engaged with the switch and invited the consultant pharmacist to discuss this at the interface meeting. We were not able to source the recommended midazolam 10 mg/5 mL. The switch to chloral hydrate to 1 g/5 mL was calculated to have a significant cost pressure therefore it was agreed that that we would not change from chloral hydrate 500 mg/5 mL at this time as it is mainly used in the in-patient setting within our Trust. Based on current usage there is an estimated cost saving of over £5 k based on the switch of sodium chloride, sildenafil, furosemide and spironolactone. The impact will be reviewed in 6 months. Conclusion A successful switch requires a team approach but will benefit patient safety and save money. Reference The Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacists Group (NPPG) and Royal College of Paediatric and Child Health (RCPCH). Position statement 18–01 Using Standardised Strengths of Unlicensed Liquid Medicines in Children. Version 2. May 2019.
机译:背景技术英国国家地位对未经许可液体药物标准化优势的陈述建议,当儿童需要未经许可的液体药物时,他们应该得到推荐的力量。通过标准化这些药物的优点,将减少对儿童剂量的误差的风险,并防止意外下降并过量。 1我们的信任有4个医院网站,因为2012年融合,我们发现切换到远离简单的标准实力的过程。方法确定药房分配系统(JAC)上市的未经许可液体药物的优势,以及特种用户。咨询了药房和临床行为,以协议转向标准化优势。药房采购确定了标准化优势的新产品,并通过儿科药剂师进行了适合性的审查。进行了成本影响分析。沟通被送到利益攸关方,包括医生,护士,药房和初级保健。结果与讨论,我们发现了形式化阿蒙松,甜瓜,奥诺布拉唑,苯吡酮和吡嗪酰胺强度的偶氮唑,Clonazinap,乙胺,甲苯胺,苯吡唑和吡嗪酰胺强度的标准化优势。不使用氯吡格雷,氢化氢,塞拉葡萄酒和标准杆菌液。不同部位和专业使用所列未经许可液体药物的不同优点。牵头专业药剂师同意标准化。我们确定了使用许可产品可用的未经许可的产品(西地那非20mg / 5 ml和呋塞米5mg / 5ml)。我们将这些物品添加了我们的评论。我们无法为某些物品提供单一标准实力;新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)在500克下有500克的婴儿,可用推荐的强度测量小于0.1ml的剂量的呋塞米,螺旋体和西地那非。该体积被认为是安全的令人满意的令人满意的1.已经同意新生儿铅药剂师,Sildenafil(未授予的20mg / 5ml),硫酸烯酮(未授免10mg / 5ml)和呋塞米(20mg / 5ml)的额外强度仅适用于适用性Nicu使用。通过在药房系统上指定“不用于放电 - 住院性使用”以及仅作为药物分布的NICU股票来降低患者对非标度的患者的潜力降低。承认其他优势的患者将转换(同意);为了最大限度地减少风险药剂师将确保护理人员了解施用和解TTA的变化和正确的剂量体积,并注意到GP的浓度变化。初级保健一直与交换机进行,并邀请顾问药剂师在界面会议上讨论这一点。我们无法来源推荐的Midazolam 10 mg / 5 ml。计算转换为1g / 5ml至1g / 5ml的开关以具有显着的成本压力,因此据一致认为,我们不会在此时从氯水合物500mg / 5ml改变,因为它主要用于患者在我们的信任范围内设置。基于当前用途,基于氯化钠,西地那非,呋塞米和螺旋酮的开关,估计成本为5英镑。影响将在6个月内审查。结论成功的交换机需要团队方法,但会使患者安全性和省钱予以利用。参考新生儿和儿科药理论组(NPPG)和皇家儿科和儿童健康学院(RCPCH)。立场声明18-01利用儿童中未经许可的液体药物的标准化优势。版本2. 2019年5月。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号