...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Adhesion Science >Micromorphological analysis and bond strength comparison of two adhesives for different degrees of dental fluorosis
【24h】

Micromorphological analysis and bond strength comparison of two adhesives for different degrees of dental fluorosis

机译:两种牙科氟中毒两种粘合剂的微观分析和粘合强度比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this study was to analyze morphologically the all-etching bonding system and self-etching bonding system for enamel with different degrees of fluorosis and evaluate the bond strength of each system. Teeth that were indicated for extraction owing to orthodontic or periodontal problems were selected. According to Dean’s index and the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index, 180 extracted teeth were divided into three groups of mild, moderate, and severe dental fluorosis (DF), with 60 teeth in each group. The teeth in each group were randomly divided into two subgroups (n?=?30), which were then subjected to the all-etching bonding system (Prime & Bond NT) and self-etching bonding system (SE-Bond). Each group of adhesives was used to bond Z350 universal resin (3?M) to the etched dental enamel. Tensile and shear tests were conducted to determine the bond strength. Subsequently, the fractured specimens were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The Prime & Bond NT was statistically significant for the tensile and shear strength of enamel with mild fluorosis (P 0.05). The SE-Bond was not statistically significant for the tensile and shear strength of mild, moderate, or severe DF (P??0.05). The SEM and CLSM results reveal that the mild fluorosis enamel crystals were relatively dense, and a small amount of resin remained. The moderate fluorosis enamel crystals were loosely arranged, and the gaps were widened. The severe fluorosis enamel crystals were irregularly arranged. The disorder was aggravated, and the dentinal orifice was exposed by partial enamel exfoliation. The bonding strength of mild fluorosis enamel with the Prime & Bond NT was better than that with the SE-Bond, and cohesive failure was the most common mode of failure. Because there was no difference in the bonding strength of the SE-Bond for different degrees of DF, we recommend the use of the all-etching adhesive system in the clinical treatment of teeth with mild fluorosis.
机译:本研究的目的是分析形态学上的全蚀刻粘合系统和用于牙釉质的全蚀刻粘合系统,具有不同程度的氟,并评估每个系统的粘合强度。选择出于正畸或牙周问题所示提取的牙齿。根据院长的指数和Thylstrup-Fejerskov指数,180名提取的牙齿分为三组轻度,中等和严重的牙源性症(DF),每组60颗牙齿。将每组中的牙齿随机分为两个亚组(n≤=Δ30),然后进行全蚀刻粘合系统(素粘合NT)和自蚀刻粘合系统(SE-BOND)。每组粘合剂用于将Z350通用树脂(3Ωm)粘合到蚀刻的牙釉质中。进行拉伸和剪切试验以确定粘合强度。随后,使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)来研究骨折样本。 Prime&Bond NT对于具有轻度氟中毒的牙釉质的拉伸和剪切强度有统计学意义(p 0.05)。 SE-BOND对于轻度,中度或严重DF的拉伸和剪切强度(P≥10.05)的拉伸和剪切强度没有统计学意义。 SEM和CLSM结果表明,温和氟中毒牙釉质晶体相对致密,少量树脂仍然存在。中等氟中毒牙釉质晶体松散地布置,扩大了间隙。严重的氟中毒牙釉质晶体不规则地排列。这种疾病加剧,牙本质孔通过部分牙釉质剥离暴露。与素键NT的温和氟中毒牙釉质的粘合强度优于Se-键,粘性衰竭是最常见的失效模式。由于SE-键对不同程度的DF的粘合强度没有差异,所以建议使用全蚀刻粘合剂系统在牙齿的临床处理中使用轻度氟。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号