...
首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine >Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho
【24h】

Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho

机译:混合方法评估家庭医学研究培训和莱索托同行指导

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Strengthening primary care research capacity is a priority globally. Family medicine training programmes in sub-Saharan Africa represent an important opportunity to build primary care research; however, they are often limited by insufficient research training and mentorship. Peers can be used to extend research mentorship capacity, but have not been evaluated in this context. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate one family medicine training programme’s research capacity building efforts through a blended research curriculum and peer mentorship. Setting: Lesotho is a landlocked country within South Africa of approximately two million people. The Family Medicine Specialty Training Programme (FMSTP) is the only accredited postgraduate medical education programme in Lesotho. Methods: This two-year mixed-methods evaluation used: (1) Likert-scale surveys measuring trainee research confidence, (2) written evaluations by trainees, peers, programme faculty and administrators and (3) in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Survey data were analysed using Friedman and sign tests. Interview and written data were analysed thematically via a mixed inductive-deductive approach using Cooke’s framework. Results: Family Medicine Specialty Training Programme trainees ( n = 8) experienced moderate increases in research confidence that were statistically significant. Skill-building occurred primarily via experiential learning. Research was grounded in trainees’ clinical practice and locally relevant. A positive research culture was created, promising for sustainability. We identified infrastructure gaps, including funding and protected time. Peer research mentorship supported trainees’ motivation and provided a safe space for questions. Conclusion: The FMSTP research curriculum and peer mentorship programme were successful in positively impacting a number of Cooke’s research capacity domains. This evaluation identified improvements that are now being implemented.
机译:背景:加强初级保健研究能力是全球优先事项。撒哈拉以南非洲的家庭医学培训计划代表了建立初级保健研究的重要机会;然而,它们通常受到研究培训和指导不足的限制。同行可用于扩展研究指导能力,但尚未在此背景下进行评估。目的:本研究的目的是通过混合研究课程和同行指导来评估一个家庭医学培训计划的研究能力建设努力。环境:莱索托是南非内部的内陆国家,大约200万人。家庭医学专业培训计划(FMSTP)是莱索托唯一认可的研究生医学教育计划。方法:使用这项两年的混合方法评估:(1)李克特级调查衡量实习生研究信心,(2)受训人员,同行,计划教师和管理员的书面评估和(3)深入,半结构化访谈。使用弗里德曼和标志测试分析了调查数据。通过使用Cooke的框架,通过混合的归纳 - 演绎方法对面试和书面数据进行专访。结果:家庭医学专业培训计划学员(N = 8)经历了适度的研究信心的增加,这些统计数据具有统计学意义。技能建设主要通过经验学习发生。研究在学员的临床实践和当地相关的研究。创造了积极的研究文化,承诺可持续发展。我们确定了基础设施差距,包括资金和受保护的时间。同行研究指导支持受训者的动机,并为问题提供了安全的空间。结论:FMSTP研究课程和同行指导计划成功地积极影响了许多Cooke的研究能力域。该评估确定了现在正在实施的改进。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号