...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Resource Economics Review >Rural versus Urban Areas and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
【24h】

Rural versus Urban Areas and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

机译:农村与城市地区和补充营养援助计划

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study quantifies how spending changes induced by the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) affects production and employment in rural and urban areas. A general equilibrium simulation model with an estimated demand system is first used to project how SNAP affects spending on different goods and services. These impacts are then linked to the expansion and contraction of different economic sectors that differ in importance across rural and urban Oregon. In urban areas, a number of service sectors linked to higher-income households shrink slightly in response to SNAP, while food-related sectors expand; the net effect on jobs is slightly negative. Production changes in rural areas are generally smaller, while having a slightly positive net effect on jobs. Overall, SNAP makes a positive difference for low- or no-income households without strong effects elsewhere in the economy.
机译:本研究量化了补充营养援助计划(SNAP)引起的支出变化如何影响农村和城市地区的生产和就业。具有估计需求系统的一般均衡模拟模型首先用于项目如何影响不同商品和服务的支出。随后这些影响与不同经济部门的扩张和收缩相关联,这些部门对农村和城市俄勒冈州的重要性不同。在城市地区,与高收入家庭相关的一些服务部门略微萎缩,以响应捕捉,而食品相关部门拓展;关于工作的净效应略有阴性。农村地区的生产变化一般较小,同时对就业有略微积极的净效应。总体而言,Snap对低收入或无收入家庭产生了积极的差异,没有经济其他地方的强烈影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号