...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Radiation Oncology >Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy
【24h】

Clinical Experience With Machine Learning-Based Automated Treatment Planning for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy

机译:基于机器学习的自动治疗计划的临床经验,适用于全乳房放射治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeThe machine learning–based automated treatment planning (MLAP) tool has been developed and evaluated for breast radiation therapy planning at our institution. We implemented MLAP for patient treatment and assessed our clinical experience for its performance.Methods and MaterialsA total of 102 patients of breast or chest wall treatment plans were prospectively evaluated with institutional review board approval. A human planner executed MLAP to create an auto-plan via automation of fluence maps generation. If judged necessary, a planner further fine-tuned the fluence maps to reach a final plan. Planners recorded the time required for auto-planning and manual modification. Target (ie, breast or chest wall and nodes) coverage and dose homogeneity were compared between the auto-plan and final plan.ResultsCases without nodes (n = 71) showed negligible (<1%) differences for target coverage and dose homogeneity between the auto-plan and final plan. Cases with nodes (n = 31) also showed negligible difference for target coverage. However, mean ± standard deviation of volume receiving 105% of the prescribed dose and maximum dose were reduced from 43.0% ± 26.3% to 39.4% ± 23.7% and 119.7% ± 9.5% to 114.4% ± 8.8% from auto-plan to final plan, respectively, all withP≤ .01 for cases with nodes (n = 31). Mean ± standard deviation time spent for auto-plans and additional fluence modification for final plans were 12.1 ± 9.3 and 13.1 ± 12.9 minutes, respectively, for cases without nodes, and 16.4 ± 9.7 and 26.4 ± 16.4 minutes, respectively, for cases with nodes.ConclusionsThe MLAP tool has been successfully implemented for routine clinical practice and has significantly improved planning efficiency. Clinical experience indicates that auto-plans are sufficient for target coverage, but improvement is warranted to reduce high dose volume for cases with nodal irradiation. This study demonstrates the clinical implementation of auto-planning for patient treatment and the significant importance of integrating human experience and feedback to improve MLAP for better clinical translation.
机译:目的,已经开发了基于机器学习的自动化处理规划(MLAP)工具,并在我们机构的乳房放射治疗计划中进行了开发和评估。我们实施了MLAP进行患者治疗,并评估了我们的临床经验。预先评估了102例乳房或胸壁治疗计划中的102例乳房或胸壁治疗计划的临床经验。人类策划者执行MLAP以通过流量图的自动化创建自动计划。如果判断必要,计划员进一步细化了流量地图以达到最终计划。规划者记录了自动规划和手动修改所需的时间。在自动计划和最终计划之间比较靶(即乳房或胸壁和节点)覆盖和剂量均匀性。没有节点(n = 71)的方法,显示出可忽略的(<1%)的目标覆盖和剂量均匀性之间的差异自动计划和最终计划。节点(n = 31)的案例还显示了目标覆盖范围可忽略的差异。然而,从自动计划到最终的情况下,接受一定规定剂量和最大剂量的体积的平均值±26.3%降低了43.0%±26.3%至39.4%±9.5%至114.4%±8.8%。对于具有节点的情况(n = 31),分别计划分别为p≤01。用于自动规划的平均值±标准偏差时间和最终计划的额外流量修改分别为12.1±9.3和13.1±12.9分钟,分别为13.4±9.7和26.4±16.4分钟,用于节点Conclusionsthe MLAP工具已成功实施用于常规临床实践,并显着提高了规划效率。临床经验表明,自动计划足以进行目标覆盖,但有必要改善,以减少节点辐照的病例的高剂量体积。本研究表明了患者治疗的自动规划的临床实施以及整合人体经验和反馈的重要性,以提高MLAP进行更好的临床翻译。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号