首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Radiation Oncology >Offline Quality Assurance for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans for NRG-HN001 Head and Neck Clinical Trial Using Knowledge-Based Planning
【24h】

Offline Quality Assurance for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans for NRG-HN001 Head and Neck Clinical Trial Using Knowledge-Based Planning

机译:利用知识型规划,利用基于知识规划的NRG-HN001头部和颈部临床试验的强度调制放射治疗治疗计划的离线质量保证

获取原文
       

摘要

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate whether a disease site–specific, multi-institutional knowledge based-planning (KBP) model can improve the quality of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for patients enrolled in the head and neck NRG-HN001clinical trial and to establish a threshold of improvements of treatment plans submitted to the clinical trial.Methods and MaterialsFifty treatment plans for patients enrolled in the NRG-HN001 clinical trial were used to build a KBP model; the model was then used to reoptimize 50 other plans. We compared the dosimetric parameters of the submitted and KBP reoptimized plans. We compared differences between KBP and submitted plans for single- and multi-institutional treatment plans.ResultsMean values for the dose received by 95% of the planning target volume (PTV_6996) and for the maximum dose (D0.03cc) of PTV_6996 were 0.5 Gy and 2.1 Gy higher in KBP plans than in the submitted plans, respectively. Mean values for D0.03cc to the brain stem, spinal cord, optic nerve_R, optic nerve_L, and chiasm were 2.5 Gy, 1.9 Gy, 6.4 Gy, 6.6 Gy, and 5.7 Gy lower in the KBP plans than in the submitted plans. Mean values for Dmeanto parotid_R and parotid_L glands were 2.2 Gy and 3.8 Gy lower in KBP plans, respectively. In 33 out of 50 KBP plans, we observed improvements in sparing of at least 7 organs at risk (OARs) (brain stem, spinal cord, optic nerves (R & L), chiasm, and parotid glands [R & L]). A threshold of improvement of OARs sparing of 5% of the prescription dose was established for providing the quality assurance results back to the treating institution.ConclusionsA disease site–specific, multi-institutional, clinical trial-based KBP model improved sparing of OARs in a large number of reoptimized plans submitted to the NRG-HN001 clinical trial, and the model is being used as an offline quality assurance tool.
机译:目的研究旨在调查疾病现场特定,多机构知识的规划(KBP)模型是否可以提高强度调制的放射治疗治疗计划,对患有头部和颈部NRG-HN001临床试验的患者并建立一个提交给临床试验的治疗计划的改善的门槛。使用NRG-HN001临床试验中注册的患者的方法和物质步骤治疗计划建立KBP模型;然后,该模型用于重新优化50个其他计划。我们比较了提交和KBP重新优化计划的单模参数。我们比较了KBP之间的差异,并提交了单一和多制度治疗计划的计划。95%的计划目标体积(PTV_6996)和PTV_6996的最大剂量(D0.03cc)接收的剂量的评价为0.5倍KBP计划中的2.1 Gy分别比提交的计划更高。 D0.03cc对脑干的平均值,脊髓,视神经_R,视神经_L和Chiasm为2.5 Gy,1.9 Gy,6.4 Gy,6.6 Gy,而在KBP计划中较低,比提交的计划中的5.7 Gy降低。 Dmeanto Parotid_r和Parotid_l腺的平均值分别为2.2 GY和3.8 Gy在KBP计划中较低。在50个KBP计划中,我们观察到在风险(OAR)(脑干,脊髓,视神经(R&L),Chiasm和腮腺和腮腺[R&L]中缓解至少7个器官的改进。建立了5%的处方剂量的桨的改善阈值,以便向治疗机构提供质量保证结果。结合疾病特异性,多机构,多机构,临床试验的KBP模型改善了桨的备忘大量的重新优化计划提交给NRG-HN001临床试验,该模型被用作离线质量保证工具。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号