首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >Investigating Knowledge, Attitude, and Beliefs Regarding Placebo Interventions in Clinical Practice: A Comparative Study of Nursing and Medical University Students
【24h】

Investigating Knowledge, Attitude, and Beliefs Regarding Placebo Interventions in Clinical Practice: A Comparative Study of Nursing and Medical University Students

机译:关于临床实践中安慰剂干预的知识,态度和信念:护理和医科大学生比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Placebo interventions are commonly used in medical practice for alleviating symptoms of illnesses. Placebo is considered a pseudo-medication and its use is debatable ethically, professionally, and legally. Despite that there is also a lack of evidence on understanding of placebo interventions among health profession students. Further, no previous studies have been conducted to investigate whether future nurses and physicians differ in their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding placebo intervention. Materials and Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was carried out for exploring knowledge, attitude, and beliefs about placebo interventions among a convenient sample of 187 medical and nursing students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. Data were collected using a sociodemographic data sheet and a 32-item placebo knowledge, beliefs, and attitude scale, which was developed from the evidence-based literature. Validity and reliability were ensured through utilizing a panel of experts and internal consistency analysis. Results: Overall mean participants’ knowledge score was 7.68± 2.07 (out of 15). Nursing students showed significantly higher knowledge than medical students ( P =0.028). More nursing than medical students believed in the effectiveness of placebo ( P ?0.001). Medical students had a stronger belief that the placebo effect is mental, while nursing students reported that it is both mental and physiologic ( P ?0.006). Concerning placebo attitude, medical students significantly pointed out that it should generally be prohibited and should not be permitted unless research supports its use ( P ?0.001). Both groups agreed that impure placebo intervention involves deception. Conclusion: Participants’ overall placebo knowledge was low. Inconsistencies in attitude and beliefs were shown among students. Current study findings offered a unique opportunity to better study misunderstandings for placebo, which might open the gate for misuse and place patients at risk of deception. Additionally, study findings were imperative as a relevant evidence-based recommendation for nursing and medical educators could be achieved.
机译:背景:安慰剂干预通常用于缓解疾病症状的医学实践中。安慰剂被认为是伪药,其使用是道德,专业,合法的争夺。尽管缺乏有关卫生职业学生的安慰剂干预措施的证据。此外,没有进行以前的研究,以调查未来护士和医生是否与其知识,态度和关于安慰剂干预的信仰不同。材料和方法:进行了比较横断面研究,用于探索关于安慰剂干预的知识,态度和信仰,这是一个方便的187名医疗和护理学生的安慰剂,在沙特·宾阿比尔拉齐兹大学卫生科学大学。利用社会渗目数据表和32项安慰剂知识,信仰和态度规模收集数据,该数据是从基于证据的文献制定的。通过利用专家小组和内部一致性分析,确保了有效性和可靠性。结果:总体平均参与者的知识评分为7.68±2.07(15分)。护理学生表现出比医学生更高的知识(P = 0.028)。比医学生更为护理,相信安慰剂的有效性(p?0.001)。医学生对安慰剂效应是精神的,同时,护理学生报告称它既是精神和生理(P?0.006)。关于安慰剂态度,医学生明显指出,除非研究支持它使用,否则不应允许禁止,不应允许(P?0.001)。两组都同意不纯粹的安慰剂干预涉及欺骗。结论:参与者的整体安慰剂知识很低。在学生中显示了态度和信仰的不一致。目前的研究结果提供了一个独特的机会,可以更好地研究安慰剂的误解,这可能会打开滥用和放置欺骗风险的患者的大门。此外,研究调查结果必须是可以实现相关证据和医疗教育工作者的相关证据。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号