首页> 外文期刊>Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica >A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures
【24h】

A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures

机译:常规与三维印刷模型辅助手术治疗髋臼骨折的回顾性比较

获取原文
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of the conventional versus individualized three-dimensional (3D) printing model-assisted pre-contoured plate fixation in the treatment of patients with acetabular fractures.METHODS:The data from 18 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the acetabular fractures were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups (9 in each): conventional and 3D printed model-assisted. The groups were then compared in terms of the duration of surgery, time of instrumentation, time of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and volume of blood loss. The quality of the fracture reduction was also evaluated postoperatively by radiography and computed tomography in both the groups. The quality of the fracture reduction was defined as good (2 mm) based on the amount of displacement in the acetabulum.RESULTS:The conventional group included 9 patients (9 males; mean age=41.7 years; age range=16-70) with a mean follow-up of 11.9 months (range=8-15); the 3D printed model-assisted group consisted of 9 patients (9 males; mean age=46.2 years; age range=30-66) with a mean follow-up of 10.33 months (range=7-17). The average duration of surgery, mean time of instrumentation, time of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and mean volume of blood loss were 180.5±9 minutes, 36.2±3.6 minutes, 6±1 times, and 403.3±52.7 mL in the 3D printed model-assisted group, and 220±15.6 minutes, 57.4±10.65 minutes, 10.4±2.2 times, and 606.6±52.7 mL in the conventional group, respectively. Procedurally, the average duration of surgery, mean time of instrumentation, and mean time of fluoroscopy were significantly shorter, and the mean volume of blood loss was significantly lower in the 3D printed model-assisted group (p0.05). The quality of the fracture reduction was good in 7 patients (78%) in the conventional group and 8 patients (89%) in the 3D printed model-assisted group.CONCLUSION:As compared with the conventional surgery, the 3D printing model-assisted pre-contoured plate fixation technique can improve the clinical and radiological outcomes of the acetabular fractures, with shorter surgery, instrumentation, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and blood loss.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level III, Therapeutic study.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较常规与个性化的三维(3D)印刷模型辅助预翻封板固定的临床和放射性结果,治疗髋臼骨折的患者。方法:来自18的数据回顾性分析了接受髋臼骨折手术的患者的连续患者。患者分为两组(各9个):常规和3D印刷模型辅助。然后根据手术,仪器时间,术中透明透视时间和失血量的时间进行比较这些组。还通过射线照相术后评估骨折减少的质量,并在两组中计算过剖析。骨折减少的质量被定义为基于acetabulum中位移量的良好(2mm)。结果:常规组包括9名患者(9名男性;平均年龄= 41.7岁;年龄范围= 16-70)平均随访11.9个月(范围= 8-15); 3D印刷模型辅助组由9名患者(9名男性;平均年龄= 46.2岁;年龄范围= 30-66),平均随访10.33个月(范围= 7-17)。手术的平均持续时间,仪器的平均时间,术中透视的时间,平均损失的均值为180.5±9分钟,36.2±3.6分钟,6±1次,3D印刷模型辅助3D 403.3±52.7 ml组,220±15.6分钟,57.4±10.65分钟,10.4±2.2倍,常规组中的606.6±52.7ml。程序性地,手术的平均持续时间,仪器的平均时间和平均时间明显较短,3D印刷模型辅助组中的血液损失的平均体积显着降低(P <0.05)。在常规组和8名患者中,在3D印刷模型辅助组中的7名患者(78%)中,骨折减少的质量良好。结论:与传统手术相比,3D打印模型辅助相比预剥削板固定技术可以改善髋臼骨折的临床和放射性结果,手术,仪器仪器,术中透视次数和血液损失短。证据:III水平,治疗研究。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号