...
首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Physiology >Are model organisms representative for climate change research? Testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations
【24h】

Are model organisms representative for climate change research? Testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations

机译:是气候变化研究的模型生物体代表吗?在野生和实验室斑马鱼种群中测试热耐受性

获取原文
           

摘要

Model organisms can be useful for studying climate change impacts, but it is unclear whether domestication to laboratory conditions has altered their thermal tolerance and therefore how representative of wild populations they are. Zebrafish in the wild live in fluctuating thermal environments that potentially reach harmful temperatures. In the laboratory, zebrafish have gone through four decades of domestication and adaptation to stable optimal temperatures with few thermal extremes. If maintaining thermal tolerance is costly or if genetic traits promoting laboratory fitness at optimal temperature differ from genetic traits for high thermal tolerance, the thermal tolerance of laboratory zebrafish could be hypothesized to be lower than that of wild zebrafish. Furthermore, very little is known about the thermal environment of wild zebrafish and how close to their thermal limits they live. Here, we compared the acute upper thermal tolerance (critical thermal maxima; CTmax) of wild zebrafish measured on-site in West Bengal, India, to zebrafish at three laboratory acclimation/domestication levels: wild-caught, F1 generation wild-caught and domesticated laboratory AB-WT line. We found that in the wild, CTmax increased with increasing site temperature. Yet at the warmest site, zebrafish lived very close to their thermal limit, suggesting that they may currently encounter lethal temperatures. In the laboratory, acclimation temperature appeared to have a stronger effect on CTmax than it did in the wild. The fish in the wild also had a 0.85–1.01°C lower CTmax compared to all laboratory populations. This difference between laboratory-held and wild populations shows that environmental conditions can affect zebrafish’s thermal tolerance. However, there was no difference in CTmax between the laboratory-held populations regardless of the domestication duration. This suggests that thermal tolerance is maintained during domestication and highlights that experiments using domesticated laboratory-reared model species can be appropriate for addressing certain questions on thermal tolerance and global warming impacts.
机译:模型生物可用于研究气候变化影响,但目前尚不清楚对实验室条件的驯化是否改变了其热耐受性,因此是如何代表它们的野生种群。斑马鱼在野外生活在波动的热环境中,可能达到有害温度。在实验室中,斑马鱼已经经历了四十年的驯化和适应,以稳定的最佳温度少量热极端。如果保持热耐受性昂贵或者如果在最佳温度下促进实验室适应性的遗传性状与高热耐受的遗传性状不同,则可以假设实验室斑马鱼的热容量低于野性斑马鱼的热耐受性。此外,关于野生斑马鱼的热环境非常少的是,他们居住的热限制。在这里,我们将野生斑马鱼的急性上部耐热公差(临界热敏耐热性)与印度西孟加拉邦的突然斑马鱼(Temical Zebrafis)进行了比较,在三个实验室适应/驯化水平Zebrafish:野生捕获,F1疯狂捕获和驯化实验室AB-WT系列。我们发现在野外,CTMAX随着现场温度的增加而增加。然而在最温暖的地方,斑马鱼非常接近他们的热限,这表明他们目前可能遇到致命的温度。在实验室中,驯化温度似乎对CTmax产生了更强的影响,而不是在野外。与所有实验室种群相比,野生鱼中的鱼也具有0.85-1.01°C的CTmax。实验室持有和野生种群之间的这种差异表明,环境条件可以影响斑马鱼的热耐受性。然而,无论驯化持续时间如何,实验室持有人群之间的CTMAX都没有差异。这表明在驯化期间维持热耐受性,并突出显示使用驯化实验室饲养的模型物种的实验可以适当地解决有关热容耐热和全球变暖影响的某些问题。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号