首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Physiology >Measurement of free glucocorticoids: quantifying corticosteroid binding capacity and its variation within and among mammal and bird species
【24h】

Measurement of free glucocorticoids: quantifying corticosteroid binding capacity and its variation within and among mammal and bird species

机译:测量游离糖皮质激素:量化皮质类固醇结合能力及其在哺乳动物和鸟类内和中的变异

获取原文
       

摘要

Plasma glucocorticoid (CORT) levels are one measure of stress in wildlife and give us insight into natural processes relevant to conservation issues. Many studies use total CORT concentrations to draw conclusions about animals’ stress state and response to their environment. However, the blood of tetrapods contains corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), which strongly binds most circulating CORT. Only free CORT (CORT not bound by CBG) leaves the circulation and exerts biological effects on CORT-sensitive tissues. Measuring free CORT concentrations provides insight to an animal’s stress response that cannot be revealed by simply measuring total CORT. To calculate free CORT concentrations in plasma or serum samples, one needs three measurements: the binding affinity of CBG for CORT (which varies by species), the total CORT concentration in the sample and the maximum corticosteroid binding capacity (MCBC) of CBG in the sample. Here, we detail the measurement of CBG binding capacity. We compare and contrast the three main methods to measure MCBC: charcoal, cell harvester and dialysis. Each is defined by the means by which free and bound CORT are separated. We weigh the relative merits and challenges of each. We conclude that sample volume, species and taxon binding specificity, and availability of equipment are the primary considerations in selecting the appropriate separation method. For most mammals, the charcoal method is recommended. For birds, the harvester method has critical advantages over the charcoal method. The dialysis method is widely regarded as the gold standard and has lower equipment costs but is more time-intensive and costly in terms of radioactive isotope needed and is less suited to processing large numbers of samples. The binding capacity of CBG varies tremendously within and among the bird and marine mammal species studied, and we discuss the implication of this variation for understanding the role of stress in wildlife.
机译:血浆糖皮质激素(CORT)水平是野生动物压力的一种衡量标准,并使我们洞察与保护问题有关的自然过程。许多研究使用总皮质浓度来得出关于动物的应力状态和对其环境的反应的结论。然而,Tetrapods的血液含有皮质类固醇结合球蛋白(CBG),其强烈结合大多数循环的皮质。只有自由的皮质(Cort不受CBG绑定)留下循环并对皮质敏感组织发出生物学效应。测量自由的CORT浓度为动物的压力反应提供了无法通过简单测量总皮质来揭示的洞察力。为了计算血浆或血清样品中的自由皮质浓度,需要三次测量:CBG对皮质的结合亲和力(其各种各样),样品中的总皮质浓度和CBG的最大皮质类固醇结合能力(MCBC)样本。在这里,我们详细介绍了CBG结合能力的测量。我们比较并对比测量MCBC的三种主要方法:木炭,细胞收割机和透析。每个都由自由和结束的皮层分离的方法定义。我们权衡了每个人的相对优点和挑战。我们得出结论,样品体积,物种和分类融合特异性,以及设备的可用性是选择适当的分离方法的主要考虑因素。对于大多数哺乳动物,建议使用木炭方法。对于鸟类,收割机方法与木炭法具有关键优势。透析方法被广泛认为是黄金标准,并且设备成本较低,但在需要放射性同位素方面具有更高的时间密集且昂贵,并且不太适合加工大量样品。 CBG的结合能力在学习的鸟类和海洋哺乳动物物种之内和鸟类和海洋哺乳动物物种之中各不均匀,并且我们讨论了这种变化的含义以了解压力在野生动物中的作用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号