首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and Experimental Dental Research >Clinical and radiographic comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of restoring destroyed primary incisors using two different techniques—A pilot study
【24h】

Clinical and radiographic comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of restoring destroyed primary incisors using two different techniques—A pilot study

机译:临床和放射线照相比较研究,评价恢复破坏初级牙髓的功效使用两种不同技术 - 试验研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: The restoration of destroyed maxillary primary incisors is difficult because of the insufficient amount of coronal structure. This pilot study aimed to compare the efficacy of composite posts technique and glass fiber posts technique in restoring destroyed primary incisors. Materials and Methods: Thirty‐six destroyed maxillary primary incisors in 11 children with early childhood caries were randomly assigned after endodontic treatment into two groups: glass fiber posts (n =?18) and composite resin posts (n =?18). Blinded clinical evaluation was made at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and Blinded radiographic evaluation was made at 6 and 12?months. The evaluation was according to the FDI criteria. Data were analyzed with Fisher's exact test (α =?.05). Result: After 12?months post‐treatment, the success rates were 88.2% in glass fiber posts group and 70.6% in composite resin posts group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups according to the evaluation criteria (p‐value .05). Conclusion: Glass fiber posts technique and Composite posts technique may be used in the restoration of destroyed primary incisors.
机译:目的:由于冠状结构量不足,恢复被破坏的上颌初级牙髓。该试点研究旨在比较复合柱技术和玻璃纤维柱技术在恢复被破坏的初级牙髓的疗效进行比较。材料和方法:在牙髓治疗中随机分配11例患儿童患儿童龋齿的306名炎症初级牙髓分为两组:玻璃纤维柱(n =α18)和复合树脂柱(n =α18)。在3,6,9和12个月内进行盲盲的临床评估,并在6和12个月内进行盲目的放射线摄影评估。评估根据外国直接投资标准。通过Fisher的确切测试分析数据(α= 05)。结果:治疗后12个月后,玻璃纤维柱组中的成功率为88.2%,复合树脂柱组70.6%。根据评价标准(P值> .05),两组之间没有统计学上的差异。结论:玻璃纤维柱技术和复合柱技术可用于恢复破坏的初级牙髓。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号