首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications >Prequestions do not enhance the benefits of retrieval in a STEM classroom
【24h】

Prequestions do not enhance the benefits of retrieval in a STEM classroom

机译:预判集不会提高茎秆课堂中检索的好处

获取原文
       

摘要

Answering questions before a learning episode—“prequestions”—can enhance memory for that information. A number of studies have explored this effect in the laboratory; however, few studies have examined prequestions in a classroom setting. In the current study, the effects of prequestions were examined in an undergraduate course in chemical engineering. At the start of several class meetings, students were provided with a prequestion to answer about the upcoming lesson, and then were asked to provide ratings of confidence in their answers, familiarity with the content in the prequestion, and how much of the assigned reading they had completed. At the end of class, students were given the same question again (postquestion), along with a different question from the same lesson (new question). On a quiz at the end of each week, students were given the postquestions and new questions again, in addition to never-before-seen questions (quiz-only questions) from the same lessons. Performance on questions at the end of class revealed no difference in performance for postquestions vs. new questions. Although weekly quiz performance revealed an effect of retrieval practice—superior memory for material tested at the end of class (postquestions and new questions) compared to material not tested (quiz-only questions)—there was no difference in weekly quiz performance on postquestions vs. new questions. These results suggest that retrieval practice is beneficial to learning in the classroom. However, prequestions do not appear to enhance learning, nor to enhance the effects of retrieval practice.
机译:在学习剧集之前回答问题 - “预判集” - 加强该信息的内存。许多研究探讨了实验室的这种效果;然而,很少有研究在课堂环境中检查了预约。在目前的研究中,在化学工程本科课程中检测了预判处的影响。在几阶级会议开始时,学生被提供了一个以回答即将举行的课程的预审,然后被要求为他们的答案提供信心的评级,熟悉前记下的内容,以及多少分配的阅读他们已经完成了。在课程结束时,学生们再次获得了同样的问题(假设),以及来自同一课程(新问题)的不同问题。在每周结束时的测验上,除了从同一课程中的绝不会出现的问题(唯一的问题)外,学生还被学生再次获得了演查和新问题。课程结束时的问题表现出在后记与新问题的表现没有差异。虽然每周测验性能显示检索实践的效果 - 与未经测试的材料(后记和新问题)在课程结束时测试的物料卓越的内存(唯一的问题) - 在后记时每周测验表现没有差异。新问题。这些结果表明,检索实践有利于在教室里学习。但是,似乎没有提高学习的预判,也不会增强检索实践的影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号