...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology >The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Right- vs Left-lateral Starting Position in Unsedated Diagnostic Colonoscopy with Modified-water Immersion Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study

机译:用改性水浸渍法在未经请访的诊断结肠镜检查中左侧左侧起始位置的有效性:随机对照试验研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: A colonoscopy study in sedated patients with air insufflation showed that right-lateral starting position (RLP) improved abdominal discomfort and reduced cecal intubation time. The aim of this study was to determine if RLP vs left-lateral starting position (LLP) may produce similar results in unsedated patients examined with a modified-water immersion (m-WI) method. Methods: Consecutive patients for diagnostic colonoscopy meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized. Patients and colonoscopist were unblinded. The m-WI method entailed suction during insertion not only for fecal debris evacuation but also to facilitate passage through difficult or angulated colonic flexures. Water was infused as needed when any difficulty was encountered during insertion. A bowel visualization scale (BVS) (0=totally blurred visualization; 1=blurred lumen visualization; 2=small fecal debris with clear mucosa visualization; 3= clear visualization) was used to evaluate the interference of fecal debris with cecal intubation rate and time. Results: A total of 142 patients (72 in RLP and 70 in LLP) were enrolled. The respective pain score, visual analog scale, (VAS) and cecal intubation rate were not significantly different. The cecal intubation time was nearly significantly different (13.4± 4.5 min vs 11.7± 5.4 min; p =0.054) and was significantly different in the constipation subgroup (16.0± 3.5 min vs 8.6± 3.8 min; p =0.001). The cecal intubation time based on BVS showed significant difference between RLP and LLP in Scale 2 (13.9± 4.6 min vs 10.3± 4.2 min; p =0.003) and Scale 2 and 3 combined (13.2± 4.3 min vs 10.6± 4.8 min; p =0.01), respectively. Conclusion: RLP did not improve the pain score, and LLP showed better performance in unsedated m-WI colonoscopy patients (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03489824).
机译:目的:在镇静患者空气吹入结肠镜检查的研究表明,右旋起始位置(RLP)改善腹部不适和减少的盲肠插管时间。本研究的目的是要确定是否RLP VS左旋起始位置(LLP)可以产生类似的结果在未镇静患者经修改的浸水(M-WI)方法检测。方法:连续病人诊断结肠镜检查符合入选标准的随机。病人和colonoscopist是揭盲。第m-WI方法插入不仅用于排泄物碎屑排空而且通过困难的或成角度的结肠弯曲,以促进通过期间entailed吸力。在需要时插入过程中遇到任何困难,水注入。甲肠可视刻度(BVS)(0 =完全模糊可视化; 1 =模糊腔可视化; 2 =小排泄物碎屑清晰黏膜可视化; 3 =明显的可视化)被用来评价排泄物碎屑的与盲肠插管率和时间的干扰。结果:共142名患者(72 RLP和70在LLP)的患者。各自的疼痛评分,视觉模拟评分(VAS)和盲肠插管率没有显著不同。盲肠插管时间几乎显著不同(13.4±4.5分钟VS 11.7±5.4分钟; P = 0.054),并在子组便秘不同显著(16.0±3.5分钟比8.6±3.8分钟; P = 0.001)。基于BVS盲肠插管时间显示在尺度2 RLP和LLP之间显著差异(13.9±4.6分钟VS 10.3±4.2分钟; P = 0.003)及规模2和3合并(13.2±4.3分钟VS 10.6±4.8分钟,P =分别为0.01)。结论:RLP没有改善疼痛评分,并LLP显示,未镇静M-WI结肠镜检查的患者(ClinicalTrial.gov,NCT03489824)更好的性能。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号