...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Letter to the Editor Regarding the “Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide and 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The Constant Analysis” Article [Letter]
【24h】

Letter to the Editor Regarding the “Effectiveness of 190 μg Fluocinolone Acetonide and 700 μg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The Constant Analysis” Article [Letter]

机译:致编辑的信函关于“190μg氟氨基葡萄酒丙酮酮的有效性和700μg地塞米松含有700μg的玻璃体内植入物使用该区域曲线方法:恒定分析”物品[字母]

获取原文
           

摘要

In a recent edition of Clinical Ophthalmology, Zarranz-Ventura and Mali presented1an area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis that directly compared the best correctedvisual acuity (BCVA) improvements in the pivotal diabetic macular edema (DME)trials (FAME and MEAD) for the fluocinolone acetonide implant (Iluvien) and thedexamethasone implant (Ozurdex). They concluded that patients in FAME hadsuperior BCVA improvement over the course of 36 months. We contend that thisanalysis and the resultant conclusions are flawed because of methodologic deficiencies in the MEAD trial.
机译:在最近版本的临床眼科,Zarranz-Ventura和Mali提出了1AN区域的曲线(AUC)分析,直接比较了枢轴糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)试验中的最佳矫正敏锐度(BCVA)改善(DME和米)对于氟氨基酚酮植入(ILUVIEN)和甲基塞洛尼植入(Ozurdex)。他们得出结论,患者在36个月的36个月内具有BCVA的改善。我们认为,由于米德试验中的方法缺陷,因此分析和所得结论是有缺陷的。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号