...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and Translational Medicine >EGFR T790M relative mutation purity predicts osimertinib treatment efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer patients
【24h】

EGFR T790M relative mutation purity predicts osimertinib treatment efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer patients

机译:EGFR T790M相对突变纯度预测非小细胞肺癌患者的Osimertinib治疗疗效

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Despite the impressive anti-tumor activity of osimertinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, 30–40% of patients still show limited response. There is therefore a need to identify biomarkers that accurately predict the response to osimertinib therapy. In this study, 54 patients with targeted next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA before osimertinib treatment and known T790M positivity were included. We investigated the predictive value of baseline circulating tumor DNA-derived biomarkers on osimertinib therapy. Results Baseline maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF) level was not associated with objective response rate (ORR) ( P ?=?0.886) and progression-free survival (PFS) ( P ?=?0.370) of osimertinib treatment. T790M relative mutation purity (RMP, defined here as the ratio of T790M AF to MSAF) quartiles were found to be significantly associated with ORR ( P for trend?=?0.002) and PFS ( P for trend?=?0.006), and a cut off value of 0.24 identified two distinct prognostic groups [Hazard ratio (HR)?=?0.36 for low T790M RMP, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18–0.72, P ?=?0.004). Additionally, although T790M relative mutation abundance (RMA, defined as T790M AF/EGFR driver AF) quartiles were not significantly associated with ORR ( P for trend?=?0.063), a cut off value of 0.30 also identified two distinct prognostic groups (HR?=?0.43 for low T790M RMA, 95% CI 0.22–0.85, P ?=?0.015). However, in multivariate analysis, grouping of T790M RMP showed a better predictive value (HR?=?0.46, 95% CI 0.20–1.05, P ?=?0.066) than T790M RMA (HR?=?0.71, 95% CI 0.31–1.61, P ?=?0.409). Moreover, T790M RMP as continuous covariate was independently predictive of PFS (HR?=?0.15, 95% CI 0.03–0.79, P? =0.025), while T790M RMA was not (HR?=?1.14, 95% CI 0.49–2.66, P? =0.766). An external validation cohort further confirmed the T790M RMP was significantly associated with PFS of osimertinib therapy. Conclusions This study established the independent predictive role of T790M RMP in NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib treatment.
机译:背景技术尽管表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)T790M阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的令人印象深刻的抗肿瘤活性,但30-40%的患者仍然表现出有限的反应。因此,需要鉴定准确预测对Osimertinib治疗的反应的生物标志物。在该研究中,包括54例靶向下一代测序的循环肿瘤DNA在Osimertinib处理和已知的T790M阳性之前进行循环肿瘤患者。我们调查了基线循环肿瘤DNA衍生生物标志物对Osimertinib疗法的预测值。结果基线最大体躯体等位基因频率(MSAF)水平与客观反应速率(ORR)(P?= 0.886)和无流动的存活(PFS)(P?= 0.370)的疏松术治疗无关。发现T790M的相对突变纯度(此处定义为T790M AF与MSAF的比率)四分位数与ORR显着相关(用于趋势?= 0.002)和PFS(P用于趋势?= 0.006),以及a截止值0.24鉴定了两个不同的预后群[危险比(HR)吗?= 0.36,低T790M RMP,95%置信区间(CI)0.18-0.72,P?= 0.004)。另外,尽管T790M相对突变丰度(RMA定义为T790M AF / EGFR驱动器AF)不显着与ORR显着相关(用于趋势?= 0.063),但0.30的切断值也鉴定了两个不同的预后组(HR ?=?0.43,低T790M RMA,95%CI 0.22-0.85,P?= 0.015)。然而,在多变量分析中,T790M RMP的分组显示出更好的预测值(HR?= 0.46,95%CI 0.20-1.05,P?= 0.2066),而不是T790M RMA(HR?= 0.71,95%CI 0.31- 1.61,p?=?0.409)。此外,作为连续变性的T790M RMP独立预测PFS(HR?= 0.15,95%CI 0.03-0.79,P?= 0.025),而T790M RMA不是(HR?=?1.14,95%CI 0.49-2.66 ,p?= 0.766)。外部验证队列进一步证实了T790M RMP与Osimertinib治疗的PFS显着相关。结论本研究在接受Osimertinib治疗的NSCLC患者中建立了T790M RMP的独立预测作用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号