首页> 外文期刊>Carbon balance and management >Climate change mitigation in British Columbia’s forest sector: GHG reductions, costs, and environmental impacts
【24h】

Climate change mitigation in British Columbia’s forest sector: GHG reductions, costs, and environmental impacts

机译:不列颠哥伦比亚省林业的气候变化缓解:温室气体削减,成本和环境影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract Background The potential contributions from forest-based greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation actions need to be quantified to develop pathways towards net negative emissions. Here we present results from a comparative analysis that examined mitigation options for British Columbia’s forest sector. Mitigation scenarios were evaluated using a systems perspective that takes into account the changes in emissions and removals in forest ecosystems, in harvested wood product (HWP) carbon stocks, and in other sectors where wood products substitute for emission-intensive materials and fossil fuels. All mitigation activities were assessed relative to a forward-looking ‘business as usual’ baseline for three implementation levels. In addition to quantifying net GHG emission reductions, we assessed economic, and socio-economic impacts as well as other environmental indicators relating to forest species, age class, deadwood availability and future timber supply. We further considered risks of reversal for land-based scenarios, by assessing impacts of increasing future wildfires on stands that were not harvested. Results Our spatially explicit analyses of forest sector mitigation options demonstrated a cost-effective portfolio of regionally differentiated scenarios that directed more of the harvested wood to longer-lived wood products, stopped burning of harvest residues and instead produced bioenergy to displace fossil fuel burning, and reduced harvest levels in regions with low disturbance rates. Domestically, net GHG emissions were reduced by an average of -9 MtCO 2 e year ?1 over 2020–2050 for a portfolio of mitigation activities at a default implementation level, with about 85% of the GHG emission reductions achieved below a cost of $50/tCO 2 e. Normalizing the net GHG reduction by changes in harvested wood levels permitted comparisons of the scenarios with different ambition levels, and showed that a 1 MtCO 2 increase in cumulative harvested stemwood results in a 1 MtCO 2 e reduction in cumulative emissions, relative to the baseline, for the Higher Recovery scenario in 2070. Conclusions The analyses conducted in this study contribute to the global understanding of forest sector mitigation options by providing an integrated framework to synthesize the methods, assumptions, datasets and models needed to quantify mitigation activities using a systems approach. An understanding of economically feasible and socio-economically attractive mitigation scenarios along with trade offs for environmental indicators relating to species composition and age, helps decision makers with long-term planning for land sector contributions to GHG emission reduction efforts, and provides valuable information for stakeholder consultations.
机译:摘要背景需要量化森林温室气体(GHG)缓解行动的潜在贡献,以便对净负排放的途径进行量化。在这里,我们提出了对比较分析的结果,以检查不列颠哥伦比亚省森林部门的缓解方案。使用系统透视进行缓解方案,考虑到森林生态系统,收获的木质产品(HWP)碳储备中的排放和除去的变化,以及木材产品替代排放密集型材料和化石燃料的其他部门。所有缓解活动都是相对于前瞻性的“业务”作为平常的三个实施水平的基线进行评估。除了量化净温室气体排放减少外,我们还评估了经济,社会经济影响以及与森林物种,年龄级,金代可用性和未来木材供应有关的其他环境指标。我们进一步考虑了通过评估未收获的展台上的未来野火的影响,进一步考虑了陆基情景的风险。结果我们对森林部门缓解期权的空间明确分析表现出一种成本效益的区域区别方案组合,可将收获的木材更多为更长的木制品,停止燃烧收获残渣,而是制造生物能源以取代化石燃料燃烧降低了低扰动率的地区的收获水平。在国内,净温室气体排放量平均降低-9 MTCO 2 E年(2020-2050),在违约实施水平下减缓活动组合,约85%的温室气体排放减少量低于50美元/ tco 2 e。通过采集木材水平的变化对净温室气体降低允许比较不同的野心水平的情景的比较,并表明,累积收获的STEMWOOD的1 MTCO 2增加导致累积排放量的1 MTCO 2 E减少,相对于基线,对于2070年的较高恢复情况。结论本研究中的分析通过提供综合框架来综合框架来综合框架来综合框架,为使用系统方法提供量化的方法,假设,数据集和模型来综合框架,有助于综合框架。对经济上可行和社会经济的缓解情况的理解以及与物种组成和年龄有关的环境指标的贸易办公室,有助于决策者对GHG减排努力的贡献的长期规划,为利益攸关方提供有价值的信息咨询。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号