首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery >Dyskinesia predictive value of motor ? evoked potential in gliomas surgery close to motor area under general anesthesia
【24h】

Dyskinesia predictive value of motor ? evoked potential in gliomas surgery close to motor area under general anesthesia

机译:电动机的障碍症预测值?在全身麻醉下,在近距离电机区域的胶质瘤手术中的诱发潜力

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Objective To determine the predictive value of intraoperative motor?evoked potential (MEP) on the muscle strength of patients undergoing glioma close to motor area under general anesthesia. Methods A total of 49 patients were included in this study from October 2019 to March 2020. The transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), direct cortical stimulation (DCS) and subcortical stimulation (SCS) were used to locate the motor cortex and corticospinal tract (CST), and to assess the functional integrity of motor system. A decrease of ≥ 50% of the baseline amplitude of TES or DCS was regarded as an alarm criteria. Muscle strength was evaluated with "gold standard" the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale before and after operation. Results Combined application of TES?MEP, DCS?MEP and SCS?MEP had better results in judging the integrity of motor conduction pathway. The sensitivity and specificity of TES?MEP were 2/5 and 100% (44/44), the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 2/2 and 93.62% (44/47), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of DCS?MEP were 1/1 and 10/10, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 1/1 and 10/10, respectively. There were 5 cases (10.20%) with new dyskinesia after operation. After 3 months of follow?up, muscle strength of one case returned to normal. The sensitivity and specificity of TES?MEP were 2/4 and 100% (45/45), the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 2/2 and 95.74% (45/47), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of DCS?MEP were 1/1 and 10/10, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 1/1 and 10/10, respectively. Conclusions This study indicates a high false negative rate after TES?MEP, DCS?MEP results were more consistent with postoperative motor function results, but the utilization rate was low due to the lack of exposure to the precentral gyrus cortex. Combined application of TES?MEP, DCS?MEP and SCS?MEP are more effective in judging the integrity of motor conduction pathway.
机译:摘要目的确定术中电动机的预测值诱发潜力(MEP)对近全身麻醉下电动机面积粘性胶质瘤患者肌肉力量的诱发潜力(MEP)。方法从2019年10月到2020年10月共有49名患者。经颅电刺激(TES),直接皮质刺激(DCS)和皮质刺激(SCS)用于定位电机皮质和皮质脊髓瘤(CST ),并评估电机系统的功能完整性。将TES或DCS的基线幅度的降低≥50%被认为是警报标准。肌肉力量评估了“黄金标准”医学研究委员会(MRC)在运作前后等级。结果组合TES的应用综合应用,DCS?MEP和SCS?MEP在判断电机传导通路的完整性方面有更好的结果。 TES的敏感性和特异性是2/5和100%(44/44),阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为2/2和93.62%(44/47)。 DCS的敏感性和特异性是1/1和10/10,阳性预测值和负预测值分别为1/1和10/10。手术后有5例(10.20%),新的止吐剂。 3个月后追随?上升,一个案例的肌肉力量恢复正常。 TES的敏感性和特异性是2/4和100%(45/45),阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为2/2和95.74%(45/47)。 DCS的敏感性和特异性是1/1和10/10,阳性预测值和负预测值分别为1/1和10/10。结论本研究表明,TES患者后的高假阴性速率,DCS患者患者术后术后术后术后更加一致,但由于缺乏暴露于先前术血晶皮质,利用率低。 TES的组合应用?MEP,DCS?MEP和SCS?MEP在判断电机传导通路的完整性方面更有效。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号