首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Medicine >Comparison of gross target volumes based on four‐dimensional CT, positron emission tomography‐computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in thoracic esophageal cancer
【24h】

Comparison of gross target volumes based on four‐dimensional CT, positron emission tomography‐computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in thoracic esophageal cancer

机译:基于四维CT,正电子发射断层扫描层面的总目标体积的比较胸部食管癌中的磁共振成像

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose The application value of 18F‐FDG PET‐CT combined with MRI in the radiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma was discussed by comparing the differences in position, volume, and the length of GTVs delineated on the end‐expiration (EE) phase of 4DCT, 18F‐FDG PET‐CT, and T2W‐MRI. Methods A total of 26 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer sequentially performed 3DCT, 4DCT, 18F‐FDG PET‐CT, and MRI simulation for thoracic localization. All images were fused with the 3DCT images by deformable registration. GTVCT and GTV50% were delineated on 3DCT and the EE phase of 4DCT images, respectively. The GTV based on PET‐CT images was determined by thresholds of SUV?≥?2.5 and designated as GTVPET2.5. The images of T2‐weighted?sequence and diffusion‐weighted sequence were referred as GTVMRI and GTVDWI, respectively. The length of the abnormality seen on the 4DCT, PET‐CT, and DWI was compared. Results GTVPET2.5 was significantly larger than GTV50% and GTVMRI (P?=?.000 and 0.008, respectively), and the volume of GTVMRI was similar to that of GTV50% (P?=?.439). Significant differences were observed between the CI of GTVMRI to GTV50% and GTVPET2.5 to GTV50% (P?=?.004). The CI of GTVMRI to GTVCT and GTVPET2.5 to GTVCT were statistically significant (P?=?.039). The CI of GTVMRI to GTVPET2.5 was significantly lower than that of GTVMRI to GTV50%, GTVMRI to GTVCT, GTVPET2.5 to GTV50%, and GTVPET2.5 to GTVCT (P?=?.000‐0.021). Tumor length measurements by endoscopy were similar to the tumor length as measured by PET and DWI scan (P??.05), and there was no significant difference between the longitudinal length of GTVPET2.5 and GTVDWI (P?=?.072). Conclusion The volumes of GTVMRI and GTV50% were similar. However, GTVMRI has different volumes and poor spatial matching compared with GTVPET2.5.The MRI imaging could not include entire respiration. It may be a good choice to guide target delineation and?construction of esophageal carcinoma by combining 4DCT with MRI?imaging. Utilization of DWI in treatment planning for esophageal cancer may provide further information to assist with target delineation. Further studies are needed to determine if this technology will translate into meaningful differences in clinical outcome.
机译:目的通过比较4DCT,18F的终点(EE)阶段的位置,体积和GTV的长度差异,讨论了18F-FDG PET-CT与MRI在食管癌的放射疗法中的施用值。 -FDG PET-CT和T2W-MRI。方法总共26例胸部食管癌术语依次进行3DCT,4DCT,18F-FDG PET-CT和MRI模拟,用于胸部定位。所有图像通过可变形的注册与3DCT图像融合。 GTVCT和GTV50%分别在3DCT和4DCT图像的EE相位上描绘。基于PET-CT图像的GTV由SUV阈值确定为SUV?≥≤2.5并指定为GTVPET2.5。 T2加权α序列和扩散加权序列的图像分别称为GTVMRI和GTVDWI。比较4DCT,PET-CT和DWI上看到的异常的长度。结果GTVPET2.5显着大于GTV50%和GTVMRI(P?=Δ000和0.008),GTVMRI的体积与GTV50%的体积相似(P?= 339)。在GTVMRI的CI与GTV50%和GTVPET2.5至GTV50%之间观察到显着差异(p?= 004)。 GTVMRI至GTVCT和GTVPET2.5至GTVCT的CI在统计学上有统计学意义(p?= 039)。 GTVMRI至GTVPET2.5的CI显着低于GTVMRI至GTV50%,GTVMRI至GTVCT,GTVPET2.5至GTV50%,以及GTVPET2.5至GTVCT(P?= 000-0.021)。内窥镜检查的肿瘤长度测量与通过PET和DWI扫描测量的肿瘤长度(P?> 05),GTVPET2.5和GTVDWI的纵向长度与GTVDWI(P?= 072)无显着差异)。结论GTVMRI和GTV50%的体积相似。然而,与GTVPET2.5相比,GTVMRI具有不同的卷和空间匹配差。MRI成像不能包括整个呼吸。引导目标描绘和呢?通过将4DCT与MRI结合的成像来构建食管癌的良好选择。 DWI在食管癌治疗计划中的利用可以提供进一步的信息,以协助目标划分。需要进一步的研究来确定该技术是否会转化为临床结果的有意义差异。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号