...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Medicine >A systematic review of evidence for and against routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood extracranial solid tumors
【24h】

A systematic review of evidence for and against routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood extracranial solid tumors

机译:对儿童颅外肿瘤进行治疗后,对常规监测成像进行系统审查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Regular off‐treatment imaging is often used to assess for recurrence of disease after childhood cancer treatment. It is unclear if this increases survival, or what burden surveillance places on patients, families, or health‐care services. This systematic review examines the impact of routine surveillance imaging after treatment of pediatric extracranial solid tumors. Methods Collaborative patient and public involvement informed the design and interpretation of this work. Thirteen electronic databases, conference proceedings, and trial registries were searched alongside reference list checking and forward citation searching from 1990 onwards. Studies were screened and data were extracted by two researchers. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified ROBINS‐I tool. Relevant outcomes were overall survival, psychological distress indicators, number of imaging tests, cost‐effectiveness, and qualitative data regarding experiences of surveillance programs. PROSPERO (CRD42018103764). Results Of 17?727 records identified, 55 studies of 10?207 patients were included. All studies used observational methods. Risk of bias for all except one study was moderate, serious, or critical. Data were too few to conduct meta‐analysis; however, narrative synthesis was performed. Surveillance strategies varied, and poorly reported, involving many scans and substantial radiation exposure (eg, neuroblastoma, median 133.5?mSv). For most diseases, surveillance imaging was not associated with increased overall survival, with the probable exception of Wilms tumor. No qualitative or psychological distress data were identified. Conclusions At present, there is insufficient evidence to evaluate the effects of routine surveillance imaging on survival in most pediatric extracranial solid tumors. More high‐quality data are required, preferably through randomized controlled trials with well‐conducted qualitative elements.
机译:背景技术经常脱疗成像通常用于评估儿童癌症治疗后疾病的复发。如果这会增加生存,或者对患者,家庭或保健服务的负担监测地点是不明确的。该系统综述检测治疗儿科颅外肿瘤后常规监测成像的影响。方法采购患者和公众参与了解这项工作的设计和解释。在1990年开始的参考名单检查和转发引用搜查了13个电子数据库,会议诉讼和试验登记处。筛查研究,两位研究人员提取数据。使用修改的robins-i工具评估偏见的风险。相关结果是整体生存,心理困扰指标,成像测试数量,成本效益和有关监督程序经验的定性数据。 Prospero(CRD42018103764)。结果为17〜727条记录,其中55项研究了10例,包括207名患者。所有研究都使用了观测方法。除了一项研究外,所有人都有偏见的风险是中度,严重的或批评。数据太少,无法进行Meta分析;然而,进行叙事合成。监测策略各种各样,报告差,涉及许多扫描和大量辐射暴露(例如,神经母细胞瘤,中值133.5〜MSV)。对于大多数疾病,监测成像与总体存活率增加无关,可能是威尔姆人肿瘤的可能性。没有确定任何定性或心理困扰数据。目前结论,没有足够的证据来评估常规监测成像对大多数儿科颅外肿瘤的生存的影响。需要更高质量的数据,最好是通过具有良好的定性元素的随机对照试验。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号