...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Medicine >Whole‐brain radiotherapy plus sequential or simultaneous integrated boost for the treatment of a limited number of brain metastases in non‐small cell lung cancer: A single‐institution study
【24h】

Whole‐brain radiotherapy plus sequential or simultaneous integrated boost for the treatment of a limited number of brain metastases in non‐small cell lung cancer: A single‐institution study

机译:全脑放射治疗加上非小细胞肺癌中有限数量的脑转移的顺序或同时集成升压:单一机构研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background To compare the survival outcomes and neurocognitive dysfunction in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM ≤10) treated by whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with sequential integrated boost (SEB) or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Materials Fifty‐two NSCLC patients with a limited number of BMs were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty cases received WBRT+SEB (WBRT: 3?Gy*10 fractions and BMs: 4?Gy*3 fractions; SEB group), and 32 cases received WBRT+SIB (WBRT: 3?Gy*10 fractions and BMs: 4?Gy*10 fractions; SIB group). The survival and mini‐mental state examination (MMSE) scores were compared between the groups. Results The cumulative 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year survival rates in the SEB vs SIB groups were 60.0% vs 47.8%, 41.1% vs 19.1%, and 27.4% vs 0%, respectively. The median survival times in the SEB and SIB groups were 15 and 10?months, respectively. The difference in survival rate was significant (P?=?.046). Subgroup analysis revealed that 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year survival rates and median survival time in the SEB group were significantly superior to those of the SIB?group, especially for male patients (age 60?years) with 1‐2 BMs (P??.05). The MMSE score of the SEB group at 3?months after radiation?was higher than that of the SIB group (P??.05). Nevertheless, WBRT+SEB required a longer treatment?time and greater cost (P??.005). Conclusions WBRT?+?SEB results in better survival outcomes than WBRT+SIB, especially for male patients (age 60?years) with 1‐2 BMs. WBRT+SEB also appeared to induce less neurocognitive impairment than WBRT+SIB.
机译:背景,用于比较非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑转移患者(BM≤10)的生存结果和神经认知功能障碍(BM≤10),通过全脑放射治疗(WBRT),顺序集成升压(SEB)或同时集成升压(SIB )。回顾性分析了有限数量的BMS有限数量的NSCLC患者。 20例接受WBRT + SEB(WBRT:3?GY * 10分数和BMS:4?GY * 3分数; SEB组),32例接受WBRT + SIB(WBRT:3?GY * 10分数和BMS:4? GY * 10分数; SIB组)。在组之间比较生存和迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)评分。结果SEB vsSIB组中累积的1-,2-和3年生存率分别为60.0%与47.8%,41.1%与19.1%,分别为27.4%vs 0%。 SEB和SIB组中的中位存活时间分别为15%和10个月。存活率的差异很大(p?= 046)。亚组分析表明,SEB组中的1-,2-和3年生存率和中位生存时间明显优于SIB?组,特别是对于男性患者(年龄<60?年),1-2 BMS(p?<?05)。 SEB组的MMSE得分在3?辐射后的3个月?高于SIB组(P?<β.05)。尽管如此,WBRT + SEB需要更长的治疗方法?时间和更高的成本(P?<?005)。结论WBRT?+?SEB导致比WBRT + Sib更好的存活结果,特别是对于男性患者(年龄<60岁),1-2 BMS。 WBRT + SEB也似乎诱导不如WBRT + SIB的神经认知障碍。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号